• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同自评工具筛查发声障碍的效率比较。

Comparison of efficiency of different self-assessment instruments for screening dysphonia.

机构信息

Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.

Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2023 Apr 17;35(2):e20210123. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232021123pt. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20232021123pt
PMID:37075411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10145995/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficiency of different vocal self-assessment instruments for dysphonia screening.

METHODS

262 dysphonic and non-dysphonic individuals participated in the research. The mean age was 41.3 (±14.5) years. The diagnosis of dysphonia was based on the auditory-perceptual analysis of the sustained vowel "é" and on laryngological diagnosis. The responses of the instruments were collected: Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL), Voice Handicap Index (VHI), VHI-10, Voice Symptoms Scale (VoiSS), and the Brazilian Dysphonia Screening Tool, (Br-DST) called in Brazilian Portuguese Instrumento de Rastreio da Disfonia (IRDBR). To analyze assertiveness in relation to the presence of dysphonia, the cutoff points of each instrument and the decision rule recommended by the IRDBR were used. An exploratory analysis was performed to compare mean scores of instruments and verify associations between variables.

RESULTS

The instruments evaluated were sensitive to capture the impact of dysphonia in a similar way regardless of professional voice use and type of dysphonia. There was a difference only in VoiSS scores for the variable gender, with a higher score for females. Regarding global assertiveness, the instruments showed high rates of success in classification, with emphasis on the VoiSS, which had the highest rate (86.3%), followed by the IRDBR (84.0%), VQL (80.9%), VHI (78.2%), and VHI-10 (75.2%).

CONCLUSION

The VoiSS has the highest assertiveness index in the identification of dysphonia, followed by the IRDBR. The IRDBR is a short, simple, and easy-to-apply tool for screening procedures.

摘要

目的

比较不同嗓音自我评估工具在嗓音障碍筛查中的效率。

方法

262 名嗓音障碍和非嗓音障碍者参与了这项研究。平均年龄为 41.3(±14.5)岁。嗓音障碍的诊断基于持续元音“é”的听觉感知分析和喉镜诊断。收集了以下仪器的反应:嗓音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)、嗓音障碍指数量表(VHI)、VHI-10、嗓音症状量表(VoiSS)和巴西嗓音障碍筛查工具(Br-DST),在巴西葡萄牙语中称为Instrumento de Rastreio da Disfonia(IRDBR)。为了分析与嗓音障碍存在相关的断言准确性,使用了每个仪器的截止值和 IRDBR 推荐的决策规则。进行了探索性分析,以比较仪器的平均分数,并验证变量之间的关联。

结果

评估的仪器对捕获嗓音障碍的影响具有相似的敏感性,无论专业嗓音使用情况和嗓音障碍类型如何。只有 VoiSS 变量的性别得分存在差异,女性得分较高。关于整体断言准确性,仪器的分类成功率很高,强调 VoiSS 的成功率最高(86.3%),其次是 IRDBR(84.0%)、VQL(80.9%)、VHI(78.2%)和 VHI-10(75.2%)。

结论

VoiSS 在识别嗓音障碍方面具有最高的断言准确性指数,其次是 IRDBR。IRDBR 是一种简短、简单且易于应用的筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Comparison of efficiency of different self-assessment instruments for screening dysphonia.不同自评工具筛查发声障碍的效率比较。
Codas. 2023 Apr 17;35(2):e20210123. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232021123pt. eCollection 2023.
2
Efficiency and Cutoff Values of Self-Assessment Instruments on the Impact of a Voice Problem.嗓音问题影响自我评估工具的效率及临界值
J Voice. 2016 Jul;30(4):506.e9-506.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
3
Voice Self-assessment Protocols: Different Trends Among Organic and Behavioral Dysphonias.嗓音自我评估方案:器质性与功能性嗓音障碍的不同趋势
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):112.e13-112.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Brazilian Dysphonia Screening Tool (Br-DST): An Instrument Based on Voice Self-Assessment Items.巴西嗓音障碍筛查工具(Br-DST):一种基于嗓音自我评估项目的工具。
J Voice. 2023 Mar;37(2):297.e15-297.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.052. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
5
Self-assessment and readiness for change in dysphonic patients.嗓音障碍患者的自我评估与改变意愿
Codas. 2016 Jul 4;0:0. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015111.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Voice Symptom Scale (I-VoiSS).嗓音症状量表意大利语版(I-VoiSS)的跨文化适应与验证
J Voice. 2017 Nov;31(6):773.e1-773.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
7
Correlation of the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) in patients with dysphonia.嗓音障碍指数 10 项(VHI-10)与嗓音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)在发音障碍患者中的相关性。
J Voice. 2014 Mar;28(2):237-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
8
The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index.《嗓音障碍指数(第 03.01 版)》,法语版和《嗓音障碍指数》。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e1-646.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
9
Voice deviation, dysphonia risk screening and quality of life in individuals with various laryngeal diagnoses.不同喉部诊断个体的声音偏差、发声障碍风险筛查及生活质量
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Mar 12;73:e174. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e174.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and cutoff values of the Brazilian version of the Voice Symptom Scale-VoiSS.巴西版嗓音症状量表(VoiSS)的跨文化适应、验证及临界值
J Voice. 2014 Jul;28(4):458-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Brazilian Dysphonia Screening Tool (Br-DST): An Instrument Based on Voice Self-Assessment Items.巴西嗓音障碍筛查工具(Br-DST):一种基于嗓音自我评估项目的工具。
J Voice. 2023 Mar;37(2):297.e15-297.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.052. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
2
Factorial Analysis of the Brazilian Version of the Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale in patients with dysphonia.嗓音障碍严重度量表(巴西版)的因子分析在发音障碍患者中的应用。
J Voice. 2022 Jan;36(1):144.e11-144.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Relationship between the presence of videolaryngoscopic signs suggestive of laryngopharyngeal reflux and voice disorders in teachers.
Codas. 2016 Jul 7;0:0. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015122.
4
Relationship between vocal symptoms, severity of voice disorders, and laryngeal diagnosis in patients with voice disorders.嗓音障碍患者的嗓音症状、嗓音障碍严重程度与喉部诊断之间的关系。
Codas. 2016 July-August;28(4):439-445. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015062.
5
Voice Self-assessment Protocols: Different Trends Among Organic and Behavioral Dysphonias.嗓音自我评估方案:器质性与功能性嗓音障碍的不同趋势
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):112.e13-112.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 May 19.
6
Dysphonia risk screening protocol.发声障碍风险筛查方案。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016 Mar;71(3):114-27. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(03)01.
7
Reduction of Risk Factors in Patients with Behavioral Dysphonia After Vocal Group Therapy.嗓音团体治疗后行为性发声障碍患者危险因素的降低
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):123.e15-123.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
8
Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Normal and Dysphonic Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.使用嗓音偏差量表对正常嗓音和发声障碍嗓音进行听觉-感知评估。
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
9
Voice Disorders: Etiology and Diagnosis.嗓音障碍:病因与诊断
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):761.e1-761.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.嗓音障碍的谐波倒谱谱指数(CSID)作为嗓音疾病筛查工具的验证:临床临界值的制定
J Voice. 2016 Mar;30(2):130-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Sep 8.