• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双平面可扩张椎间融合器用于经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在亚洲人群中是安全的,并能取得良好的1年临床和影像学结果。

Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population.

作者信息

Sim David Shaoen, Kasivishvanaath Ayyadarshan, Jiang Lei, Cheong Soh Reuben Chee, Ling Zhixing Marcus

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):520-525. doi: 10.14444/8472. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

DOI:10.14444/8472
PMID:37076255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10478701/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study investigated 1-year clinical and radiological outcomes of biplanar expandable (BE) cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in an Asian population.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive patients who underwent TLIF with BE cages performed by 2 fellowship-trained spine surgeons from 2020 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included open or minimally invasive (MIS) TLIF, of up to 3 spinal segments, performed for treatment of degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, or spinal stenosis. Patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog score (VAS) for back and lower limb pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and North American Spine Society neurogenic symptom score (NSS), and various radiographic parameters, were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients underwent TLIF with BE cages with a follow-up duration of 1.25 years. Of those patients, 7 (30%) underwent 1-level TLIF, 12 (52%) underwent 2-level TLIF, and 4 (18%) underwent 3-level TLIF, with a total of 43 spinal segments fused. Four patients (17%) underwent MIS TLIF while 19 patients (83%) underwent open TLIF. VAS for back pain scores improved by 4.8 ± 3.4 ( < 0.001) from 6.5 ± 2.6 to 1.7 ± 2.2; VAS for lower limb pain scores improved by 5.2 ± 3.8 ( < 0.001) from 5.7 ± 3.4 to 0.5 ± 1.6; ODI scores improved by 29.0 ± 18.1 ( < 0.001) from 49.4 ± 15.1 to 20.4 ± 14.2; and NSS scores improved by 36.8 ± 22.1 ( < 0.001) from 53.3 ± 21.1 to 16.5 ± 19.8. Significant improvements in radiological parameters included increase in anterior disc height, posterior disc height, foraminal height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis. There were no implant-related complications, cage subsidence, cage migration, or revision surgery at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

TLIF performed with BE cages led to significantly improved patient-reported outcomes and radiographic parameters at 1 year and is safe for use in Asians.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this study support the effectiveness and safety of TLIF with biplanar expandable cages.

摘要

背景

本研究调查了亚洲人群经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)后使用双平面可扩张(BE)椎间融合器的1年临床和影像学结果。

方法

对2020年至2021年由2名接受过专科培训的脊柱外科医生进行的所有连续接受BE椎间融合器TLIF手术的患者进行回顾性研究。纳入标准包括开放或微创(MIS)TLIF,手术节段最多为3个,用于治疗椎间盘退变、椎体滑脱或椎管狭窄。评估患者报告的结果,包括背部和下肢疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和北美脊柱协会神经源性症状评分(NSS),以及各种影像学参数。

结果

共有23例患者接受了BE椎间融合器TLIF手术,随访时间为1.25年。其中,7例(30%)接受了单节段TLIF,12例(52%)接受了双节段TLIF,4例(18%)接受了三节段TLIF,共融合43个脊柱节段。4例患者(17%)接受了MIS TLIF,19例患者(83%)接受了开放TLIF。背部疼痛VAS评分从6.5±2.6显著改善至1.7±2.2,改善了4.8±3.4(P<0.001);下肢疼痛VAS评分从5.7±3.4显著改善至0.5±1.6,改善了5.2±3.8(P<0.001);ODI评分从49.4±15.1显著改善至20.4±14.2,改善了29.0±18.1(P<0.001);NSS评分从53.3±21.1显著改善至16.5±19.8,改善了36.8±22.1(P<0.001)。影像学参数的显著改善包括椎间盘前缘高度、后缘高度、椎间孔高度、节段性前凸和腰椎前凸增加。1年时无植入物相关并发症、椎间融合器下沉、椎间融合器移位或翻修手术。

结论

使用BE椎间融合器进行的TLIF在1年时显著改善了患者报告的结果和影像学参数,对亚洲人使用是安全的。

临床意义

本研究结果支持使用双平面可扩张椎间融合器进行TLIF的有效性和安全性。

相似文献

1
Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population.双平面可扩张椎间融合器用于经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在亚洲人群中是安全的,并能取得良好的1年临床和影像学结果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):520-525. doi: 10.14444/8472. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
3
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
4
Single-Level Endoscopic TLIF Has Decreased Surgery Duration, Blood Loss, and Length of Hospital Stay While Achieving Similar 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive TLIF.与传统微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)相比,单节段内镜下TLIF减少了手术时间、失血量和住院时间,同时在1年时取得了相似的临床和影像学结果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):380-386. doi: 10.14444/8455. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Cages.使用可扩张椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 May 15;13(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00062. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
6
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Early Experience Using a Biplanar Expandable Cage for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后的临床和影像学结果——使用双平面可扩张椎间融合器治疗腰椎滑脱的早期经验
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S39-S44. doi: 10.14444/7125. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
7
Expandable cages that expand both height and lordosis provide improved immediate effect on sagittal alignment and short-term clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS TLIF)后,能够同时增加高度和恢复腰椎前凸的可扩张椎间融合器对矢状面排列和短期临床疗效具有更好的即刻效果。
J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):55-67. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-106. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
Early Experience With Uniplanar Versus Biplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中单平面与双平面可扩张椎间融合器的早期经验
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):487-497. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244870.435. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
9
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用可扩张 cage:术后晚期沉降风险增加,但围手术期结局无明显改善:一项临床单中心研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e57-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
10
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.L4/5 Ⅰ度退变性腰椎滑脱症患者斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床与影像学比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(6):1477-1487. doi: 10.1111/os.13360. Epub 2023 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Subsidence of Spinal Fusion Cages: A Systematic Review.脊柱融合器下沉:一项系统评价
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1103-1118. doi: 10.14444/8363. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable articulating interbody spacers significantly improves radiographic outcomes compared to static interbody spacers.与静态椎间融合器相比,使用可扩张关节式椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术能显著改善影像学结果。
J Spine Surg. 2021 Sep;7(3):300-309. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-630.
3
Bidirectional Expandable Technology for Transforaminal or Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis of Safety and Performance.用于经椎间孔或后路腰椎椎间融合术的双向可扩张技术:安全性与性能的回顾性分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S22-S30. doi: 10.14444/7123. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
4
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Early Experience Using a Biplanar Expandable Cage for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后的临床和影像学结果——使用双平面可扩张椎间融合器治疗腰椎滑脱的早期经验
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S39-S44. doi: 10.14444/7125. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
5
Expandable Interbody Fusion Cages: An Editorial on the Surgeon's Perspective on Recent Technological Advances and Their Biomechanical Implications.可扩张椎间融合器:外科医生对近期技术进展及其生物力学影响的观点述评
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S56-S62. doi: 10.14444/7127. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Current Concepts of Contemporary Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Designs, Part 1: An Editorial on Their Biomechanical Characteristics.当代可扩张腰椎椎间融合器设计的现状,第1部分:关于其生物力学特性的社论
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S63-S67. doi: 10.14444/7128. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
7
Current Concepts of Contemporary Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Designs, Part 2: Feasibility Assessment of an Endplate Conforming Bidirectional Expandable Interbody Cage.当代可扩张腰椎椎间融合器设计的当前概念,第2部分:一种符合终板的双向可扩张椎间融合器的可行性评估
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(s3):S68-S74. doi: 10.14444/7129. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Static Versus Expandable Devices Provide Similar Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后,静态与可扩张装置提供相似的临床结果。
HSS J. 2020 Feb;16(1):46-53. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09677-z. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
9
Cage positioning as a risk factor for posterior cage migration following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - an analysis of 953 cases.Cage 定位作为经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后后移的危险因素——953 例分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 29;20(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2630-0.
10
Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者中可扩张 cage 与不可扩张 cage 在临床和影像学结果方面的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:596-606.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.284. Epub 2019 Apr 5.