Health Technology Assessment Center/Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, China.
Health Technology Assessment Center/Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, China.
J Sci Med Sport. 2023 Apr-May;26(4-5):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
To summarize the evidence of associations between Pilates and multiple health outcomes, and evaluate the strength and validity of these associations.
Unbrella review.
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February, 2023. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2 and the certainty of evidence was graded by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. We recalculated each outcome using random-effects models with standardized mean difference.
We identified 27 systematic reviews with meta-analyses in this umbrella review. 1 was rated as high quality, 1 as moderate quality, 15 as low quality, and 10 as critically low quality. These studies focused on the populations with diseases of the circulatory system, endocrine, nutritional or metabolic diseases, genitourinary system diseases, mental, behavioral, or neurodevelopmental disorder, musculoskeletal system diseases, neoplasms, nervous system diseases, sleep-wake function disorder and others. Compared with inactive/active intervention, Pilates can reduce body mass index and body fat percentage, relieve pain and disability, and improve sleep quality and balance. The certainty of evidence was very low to moderate for these outcomes.
Pilates showed benefits on several health outcomes related with low back pain, neck pain and scoliosis. However, the certainty of the evidence was mostly low; further high quality randomized controlled trials are needed to elucidate and support these promising findings.
总结普拉提与多种健康结果之间关联的证据,并评估这些关联的强度和有效性。
伞式综述。
从建库至 2023 年 2 月,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library。使用评估系统评价的测量工具(A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews,version 2)评估纳入研究的方法学质量,并使用推荐、评估、开发和评估分级(Grading of Recommendation,Assessment,Development and Evaluations)对证据的确定性进行分级。我们使用随机效应模型和标准化均数差重新计算了每个结局。
在本次伞式综述中,我们共确定了 27 项包含荟萃分析的系统评价。其中 1 项被评为高质量,1 项为中质量,15 项为低质量,10 项为极低质量。这些研究的对象为患有循环系统疾病、内分泌、营养或代谢疾病、泌尿系统疾病、精神、行为或神经发育障碍、肌肉骨骼系统疾病、肿瘤、神经系统疾病、睡眠-觉醒功能障碍和其他疾病的人群。与不活动/活动干预相比,普拉提可以降低体重指数和体脂百分比,缓解疼痛和残疾,改善睡眠质量和平衡。这些结局的证据确定性为极低至中度。
普拉提在与腰痛、颈痛和脊柱侧凸相关的几个健康结果上显示出了益处。然而,证据的确定性大多较低;需要进一步开展高质量的随机对照试验来阐明和支持这些有前景的发现。