• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区获得性细菌性肺炎中的皮质类固醇:系统评价、成对和剂量反应荟萃分析。

Corticosteroids in Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: a Systematic Review, Pairwise and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(11):2593-2606. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08203-6. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-023-08203-6
PMID:37076606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10115386/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

International guidelines provide heterogenous guidance on use of corticosteroids for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials examining corticosteroids in hospitalized adult patients with suspected or probable CAP. We performed a pairwise and dose-response meta-analysis using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) heterogeneity estimator. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE methodology and the credibility of subgroups using the ICEMAN tool.

RESULTS

We identified 18 eligible studies that included 4661 patients. Corticosteroids probably reduce mortality in more severe CAP (RR 0.62 [95% CI 0.45 to 0.85]; moderate certainty) with possibly no effect in less severe CAP (RR 1.08 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.42]; low certainty). We found a non-linear dose-response relationship between corticosteroids and mortality, suggesting an optimal dose of approximately 6 mg of dexamethasone (or equivalent) for a duration of therapy of 7 days (RR 0.44 [95% 0.30 to 0.66]). Corticosteroids probably reduce the risk of requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.42 to 74] and probably reduce intensive care unit (ICU) admission (RR 0.65 [95% CI 0.43 to 0.97]) (both moderate certainty). Corticosteroids may reduce the duration of hospitalization and ICU stay (both low certainty). Corticosteroids may increase the risk of hyperglycemia (RR 1.76 [95% CI 1.46 to 2.14]) (low certainty).

CONCLUSION

Moderate certainty evidence indicates that corticosteroids reduce mortality in patients with more severe CAP, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission.

摘要

简介

国际指南对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中皮质类固醇的使用提供了不同的指导意见。

方法

我们对住院的疑似或可能患有 CAP 的成年患者使用皮质类固醇的随机对照试验进行了系统评价。我们使用受限最大似然(REML)异质性估计值进行了成对和剂量反应荟萃分析。我们使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性,并使用 ICEMAN 工具评估亚组的可信度。

结果

我们确定了 18 项符合条件的研究,共纳入 4661 名患者。皮质类固醇可能降低更严重 CAP 的死亡率(RR 0.62 [95% CI 0.45 至 0.85];中等确定性),对不太严重的 CAP 可能没有影响(RR 1.08 [95% CI 0.83 至 1.42];低确定性)。我们发现皮质类固醇与死亡率之间存在非线性剂量反应关系,表明治疗 7 天的最佳剂量约为 6 毫克地塞米松(或等效物)(RR 0.44 [95% 0.30 至 0.66])。皮质类固醇可能降低需要有创机械通气的风险(RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.42 至 74]),可能降低入住重症监护病房(RR 0.65 [95% CI 0.43 至 0.97])(均为中等确定性)。皮质类固醇可能缩短住院时间和 ICU 入住时间(均为低确定性)。皮质类固醇可能增加高血糖的风险(RR 1.76 [95% CI 1.46 至 2.14])(低确定性)。

结论

中等确定性证据表明,皮质类固醇可降低严重 CAP 患者的死亡率、有创机械通气的需求和 ICU 入住率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/ff12b8db7aea/11606_2023_8203_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/0d20cc91de97/11606_2023_8203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/759c7f2a2e03/11606_2023_8203_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/f3edcba86207/11606_2023_8203_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/ff12b8db7aea/11606_2023_8203_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/0d20cc91de97/11606_2023_8203_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/759c7f2a2e03/11606_2023_8203_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/f3edcba86207/11606_2023_8203_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba58/10465417/ff12b8db7aea/11606_2023_8203_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Corticosteroids in Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: a Systematic Review, Pairwise and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.社区获得性细菌性肺炎中的皮质类固醇:系统评价、成对和剂量反应荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(11):2593-2606. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08203-6. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
Prophylactic corticosteroids for paediatric heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.用于小儿体外循环心脏手术的预防性皮质类固醇
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):CD013101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013101.pub2.
3
Corticosteroid Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.糖皮质激素治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 6;163(7):519-28. doi: 10.7326/M15-0715.
4
Effect of Corticosteroids on Mortality and Clinical Cure in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression of Randomized Control Trials.糖皮质激素对社区获得性肺炎病死率和临床治愈率的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Chest. 2023 Mar;163(3):484-497. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2229. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Corticosteroids Therapy for Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人重症社区获得性肺炎辅助性皮质类固醇治疗的疗效与安全性:一项更新的系统评价与Meta分析
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0165942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165942. eCollection 2016.
6
Comparing the efficacy of corticosteroids among patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the ICU versus non-ICU settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较重症监护病房(ICU)与非ICU环境下社区获得性肺炎患者使用皮质类固醇的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Steroids. 2024 May;205:109389. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2024.109389. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
7
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.皮质类固醇治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Crit Care. 2024 Apr;80:154507. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154507. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
8
Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults.用于治疗儿童和成人脓毒症的皮质类固醇。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 6;12(12):CD002243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002243.pub4.
9
Corticosteroids in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review, Pairwise, and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的皮质类固醇:一项系统评价、成对及剂量反应荟萃分析
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jan 19;6(1):e1000. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001000. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy.预防危重病性多发性神经病和危重病性肌病的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 30;2014(1):CD006832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006832.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of standard care versus corticosteroids plus standard care for treatment of pneumonia in adults admitted to Kenyan hospitals (SONIA).一项针对肯尼亚医院收治的成年肺炎患者,比较标准治疗与皮质类固醇加标准治疗的实用随机对照试验(SONIA)。
Wellcome Open Res. 2025 May 28;7:269. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18401.2. eCollection 2022.
2
Corticosteroids for adult patients hospitalised with non-viral community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于非病毒性社区获得性肺炎住院成年患者的皮质类固醇:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07912-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Corticosteroids in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: In or Out?社区获得性肺炎中的皮质类固醇:用还是不用?
Chest. 2023 Jan;163(1):e47-e48. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.036.
2
GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach.GRADE指南34:使用最低限度情境化方法对不精确性进行评级的更新。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:216-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Low-dose methylprednisolone treatment in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.危重症社区获得性肺炎患者的小剂量甲基强的松龙治疗。
Effect of hydrocortisone on mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia : The REMAP-CAP Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial.
氢化可的松对重症社区获得性肺炎患者死亡率的影响:REMAP-CAP皮质类固醇领域随机临床试验
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Apr;51(4):665-680. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07861-w. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
4
From treatment to threat: the fatal impact of cumulative glucocorticoid dosage on outcomes in immunocompromised patients with community-acquired pneumonia.从治疗手段到致病威胁:累积糖皮质激素剂量对社区获得性肺炎免疫功能低下患者预后的致命影响
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251332085. doi: 10.1177/17534666251332085. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
5
Best practices for guideline development in Critical Care.重症监护指南制定的最佳实践。
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Feb 28;37:e20250372. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250372. eCollection 2025.
6
Updates in Hospital Medicine.医院医学的最新进展。
J Brown Hosp Med. 2023 Jul 1;2(3):82144. doi: 10.56305/001c.82144. eCollection 2023.
7
Just the Facts: role of corticosteroids for patients with septic shock, community-acquired pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.事实简述:皮质类固醇对感染性休克、社区获得性肺炎和急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的作用。
CJEM. 2025 Apr;27(4):248-252. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00863-z. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
8
Corticosteroids in Cardiogenic Shock: A Retrospective Analysis of the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV Database.皮质类固醇用于心源性休克:重症监护医学信息数据库-IV的回顾性分析
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Jan 31;7(2):e1210. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001210. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.
9
Safety of steroids in severe community-acquired pneumonia.重症社区获得性肺炎中使用类固醇的安全性。
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Jan 8;34(175). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0131-2024. Print 2025 Jan.
10
The effect and safety of corticosteroid treatment for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.皮质类固醇治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的疗效及安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 6;11:1457469. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1457469. eCollection 2024.
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Aug;48(8):1009-1023. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06684-3. Epub 2022 May 13.
4
Assessing Heterogeneity in Random-Effects Meta-analysis.评估随机效应荟萃分析中的异质性。
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:67-89. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_4.
5
Trial sequential analysis: novel approach for meta-analysis.序贯试验分析:荟萃分析的新方法。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Apr;16(2):138-150. doi: 10.17085/apm.21038. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
Corticosteroids in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 导致的急性呼吸窘迫综合征中皮质类固醇的使用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 May;47(5):521-537. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06394-2. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses.随机对照试验和荟萃分析中效应修饰分析可信度评估工具(ICEMAN)的开发。
CMAJ. 2020 Aug 10;192(32):E901-E906. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200077.
8
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in COVID-19 based on evidence for COVID-19, other coronavirus infections, influenza, community-acquired pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于 COVID-19、其他冠状病毒感染、流感、社区获得性肺炎和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的证据评估 COVID-19 中皮质类固醇的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2020 Jul 6;192(27):E756-E767. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200645. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions.GRADE 指南 26:用于沟通干预措施系统评价结果的信息性陈述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;119:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.