Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Oct;30(5):1890-1896. doi: 10.1007/s12350-023-03237-z. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
Our aim was to estimate the probability of obstructive CAD (oCAD) for an individual patient as a function of the myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured with Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET in patients with a visually normal or abnormal scan.
We included 1519 consecutive patients without a prior history of CAD referred for rest-stress Rb-82 PET/CT. All images were visually assessed by two experts and classified as normal or abnormal. We estimated the probability of oCAD for visually normal scans and scans with small (5%-10%) or larger defects (> 10%) as function of MFR. The primary endpoint was oCAD on invasive coronary angiography, when available.
1259 scans were classified as normal, 136 with a small defect and 136 with a larger defect. For the normal scans, the probability of oCAD increased exponentially from 1% to 10% when segmental MFR decreased from 2.1 to 1.3. For scans with small defects, the probability increased from 13% to 40% and for larger defects from 45% to > 70% when segmental MFR decreased from 2.1 to 0.7.
Patients with > 10% risk of oCAD can be distinguished from patients with < 10% risk based on visual PET interpretation only. However, there is a strong dependence of MFR on patient's individual risk of oCAD. Hence, combining both visual interpretation and MFR results in a better individual risk assessment which may impact treatment strategy.
我们的目的是评估个体患者存在阻塞性 CAD(oCAD)的概率,该概率取决于使用铷-82(Rb-82)PET 测量的心肌血流储备(MFR),这些患者的扫描表现为视觉正常或异常。
我们纳入了 1519 例连续的无 CAD 既往史患者,这些患者因静息-应激 Rb-82 PET/CT 而就诊。所有图像均由两位专家进行视觉评估,并分为正常或异常。我们根据 MFR 评估视觉正常扫描和存在小(5%-10%)或大(>10%)缺损的扫描中 oCAD 的概率。主要终点为有创冠状动脉造影的 oCAD,若可获取。
1259 例扫描被归类为正常,136 例存在小缺损,136 例存在大缺损。对于正常扫描,当节段性 MFR 从 2.1 降至 1.3 时,oCAD 的概率从 1%增加至 10%,呈指数增加。对于存在小缺损的扫描,概率从 13%增加至 40%,对于存在大缺损的扫描,概率从 45%增加至>70%,当节段性 MFR 从 2.1 降至 0.7 时。
仅基于视觉 PET 解读,可区分出 oCAD 风险>10%的患者与风险<10%的患者。然而,MFR 与患者个体 oCAD 风险密切相关。因此,结合视觉解读和 MFR 结果可进行更好的个体风险评估,这可能会影响治疗策略。