INVIA Medical Imaging Solutions, 3025 Boardwalk Dr., Suite 200, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Dec;51(1):136-146. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06455-2. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
Distinguishing obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) from microvascular dysfunction and diffuse atherosclerosis would be of immense benefit clinically. However, quantitative measures of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) integrate the effects of focal epicardial stenosis, diffuse atherosclerosis, and microvascular dysfunction. In this study, MFR and relative perfusion quantification were combined to create integrated MFR (iMFR) which was evaluated using data from a large clinical registry and an international multi-center trial and validated against invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
This study included 1,044 clinical patients referred for Rb rest/stress positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and ICA, along with 231 patients from the Flurpiridaz 301 trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01347710). MFR and relative perfusion quantification were combined to create an iMFR map. The incremental value of iMFR was evaluated for diagnosis of obstructive stenosis, adjusted for patient demographics and pre-test probability of CAD. Models for high-risk anatomy (left main or three-vessel disease) were also constructed.
iMFR parameters of focally impaired perfusion resulted in best fitting diagnostic models. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed a slight improvement compared to standard quantitative perfusion approaches (AUC 0.824 vs. 0.809). Focally impaired perfusion was also associated with high-risk CAD anatomy (OR 1.40 for extent, and OR 2.40 for decreasing mean MFR). Diffusely impaired perfusion was associated with lower likelihood of obstructive CAD, and, in the absence of transient ischemic dilation (TID), with lower likelihood of high-risk CAD anatomy.
Focally impaired perfusion extent derived from iMFR assessment is a powerful incremental predictor of obstructive CAD while diffusely impaired perfusion extent can help rule out obstructive and high-risk CAD in the absence of TID.
将阻塞性心外膜冠状动脉疾病(CAD)与微血管功能障碍和弥漫性动脉粥样硬化区分开来,这将具有巨大的临床益处。然而,绝对心肌血流(MBF)的定量测量综合了局灶性心外膜狭窄、弥漫性动脉粥样硬化和微血管功能障碍的影响。在这项研究中,我们结合了 MFR 和相对灌注定量,创建了综合 MFR(iMFR),并使用大型临床注册和国际多中心试验的数据对其进行了评估,还通过与侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)进行了验证。
这项研究包括 1044 名因 Rb 静息/应激正电子发射断层扫描心肌灌注成像和 ICA 而被转诊的临床患者,以及来自 Flurpiridaz 301 试验的 231 名患者(clinicaltrials.gov NCT01347710)。MFR 和相对灌注定量结合起来创建了 iMFR 图。为了诊断阻塞性狭窄,我们对 iMFR 的增量价值进行了评估,同时调整了患者的人口统计学和 CAD 的术前概率。还构建了高风险解剖模型(左主干或三血管疾病)。
局部灌注受损的 iMFR 参数产生了最佳拟合的诊断模型。与标准定量灌注方法相比,接收者操作特征分析显示出了轻微的改善(AUC 0.824 与 0.809)。局部灌注受损也与高风险 CAD 解剖结构相关(程度方面的 OR 为 1.40,平均 MFR 降低方面的 OR 为 2.40)。弥漫性灌注受损与阻塞性 CAD 的可能性降低相关,在没有短暂性缺血扩张(TID)的情况下,与低风险 CAD 解剖结构的可能性降低相关。
iMFR 评估中局部灌注受损程度是阻塞性 CAD 的一个强大的增量预测指标,而弥漫性灌注受损程度可以帮助在没有 TID 的情况下排除阻塞性和高风险 CAD。