Suppr超能文献

双吻合器技术与半双吻合器技术在腹腔镜全胃切除术后使用 OrVil™ 行食管空肠吻合术的比较:一项单盲、随机临床试验。

Double stapling technique versus hemi-double stapling technique for esophagojejunostomy with OrVil™ after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5931-5942. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10068-z. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™) is frequently selected for esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) because of its versatility. During anastomosis with OrVil™, the double stapling technique (DST) or hemi-double stapling technique (HDST) can be selected by overlapping the linear stapler and the circular stapler. However, no studies have reported the differences between the methods and their clinical significance.

METHODS

A randomized controlled clinical trial with a parallel assignment and single-blind outcomes assessment analysis was conducted. Patients with gastric cancer eligible for LTG who met the selection criteria were randomized. Preoperative characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the DST and HDST. The primary endpoint was an anastomosis-related complication, and the secondary endpoints were perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications, excluding anastomosis-related complications.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with gastric cancer were eligible and randomized. LTG and esophagojejunostomy were successfully performed in all patients, without conversion to laparotomy. Preoperative characteristics, excluding preoperative chemotherapy, were not significantly different between the two groups. One anastomotic leakage of Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ IIIa was observed in the DST, although no significant difference was found between the two groups (6.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.30). In the HDST, one case of anastomotic stricture required endoscopic balloon dilation. No significant differences were found in operative time, whereas the anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the HDST than in the DST (47.5 ± 15.8 vs. 38.2 ± 8.8 min, P = 0.028). Except for anastomosis-related complications, postoperative complications (P = 0.282) and postoperative hospital stay for the DST and HDST were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

No superiority was found between the DST and HDST with OrVil™ in esophagojejunostomy of LTG for gastric cancer with respect to postoperative complications, whereas the HDST may be preferable in terms of the simplicity of the surgical technique.

摘要

背景

经口内置吻合器(OrVil™)因其多功能性而常用于腹腔镜全胃切除术后的食管空肠吻合术。在使用 OrVil™进行吻合时,可以通过重叠线性吻合器和圆形吻合器来选择双吻合技术(DST)或半双吻合技术(HDST)。然而,目前尚无研究报道这两种方法之间的差异及其临床意义。

方法

采用平行分组和单盲结局评估分析的随机对照临床试验。符合选择标准的行全胃切除术的胃癌患者进行随机分组。比较 DST 和 HDST 组的围手术期和术后结局。主要结局是吻合相关并发症,次要结局是除吻合相关并发症以外的围手术期结局和术后并发症。

结果

共有 30 例胃癌患者符合条件并进行了随机分组。所有患者均成功完成了全胃切除术和食管空肠吻合术,无中转开腹。除术前化疗外,两组患者的术前特征无显著差异。DST 组出现 1 例 Clavien-Dindo 分级≥IIIa 的吻合口漏,但两组间无显著差异(6.6%比 0%,P=0.30)。HDST 组有 1 例吻合口狭窄,需要内镜球囊扩张。两组的手术时间无显著差异,但 HDST 的吻合时间明显短于 DST(47.5±15.8 比 38.2±8.8 分钟,P=0.028)。除吻合相关并发症外,DST 和 HDST 的术后并发症(P=0.282)和术后住院时间无显著差异。

结论

在胃癌全胃切除术后食管空肠吻合术中,与 DST 相比,OrVil™的 HDST 并不具有术后并发症方面的优势,而在手术技术的简单性方面,HDST 可能更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验