Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, N15, W7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Department of Surgery, JA Sapporo Kosei Hospital, N3, E8, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-0033, Japan.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5175-5182. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5584-z. Epub 2017 May 9.
Esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is the most technically difficult type of anastomosis; thus, anastomotic complications such as leakage and stenosis sometimes occur. Identification of the safest anastomotic procedure is important for successful LTG. We have performed LTG since 2004 either with a circular stapler using an OrVil anvil or via the overlap Orringer method with a linear stapler. This retrospective study aimed to determine which method results in a lower incidence of anastomotic complications in patients undergoing LTG.
Data on 188 consecutive patients who underwent LTG between April 2004 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into those who underwent esophagojejunostomy performed via a circular stapler using an OrVil anvil (group C, n = 49) or via the overlap method (group L, n = 139).
Anastomotic complications occurred in five of 188 esophagojejunostomies (2.7%). They comprised three cases of leakage (1.6%), and two of stenosis (1.1%). There was no significant difference in patient characteristics or hematological variables between groups C and L. There was no significant difference between groups in operation time, blood loss, lymph node dissection, and intraoperative anastomotic problems. The rate of anastomotic complications was significantly lower in group L (0.7%, 1/139) than in group C (8.2%, 4/49; p = 0.005). In particular, anastomotic leakage in group L tended to be lower (0.7% 1/139) than in group C (4.1% 2/49), although this difference was not significant. The rate of anastomotic stenosis in group L was significantly lower (0%, 0/139) than in group C (4.1%, 2/49; p = 0.017). Furthermore multivariate analysis showed anastomotic procedure was an independent factor for anastomotic complication.
There were fewer anastomotic complications after overlap esophagojejunostomy than after esophagojejunostomy via the OrVil procedure, especially regarding anastomotic stenosis. We therefore recommend the overlap technique when performing esophagojejunostomy.
腹腔镜全胃切除术后的食管空肠吻合术(LTG)是技术难度最大的吻合术;因此,吻合口并发症(如渗漏和狭窄)有时会发生。确定最安全的吻合术式对于 LTG 的成功至关重要。我们自 2004 年以来一直采用圆形吻合器加 OrVil 吻合器或重叠 Orringer 方法加线性吻合器进行 LTG。本回顾性研究旨在确定在接受 LTG 的患者中,哪种方法导致吻合口并发症的发生率更低。
回顾性分析 2004 年 4 月至 2016 年 8 月期间连续 188 例接受 LTG 的患者数据。患者分为经圆形吻合器加 OrVil 吻合器(C 组,n=49)或重叠方法(L 组,n=139)进行食管空肠吻合术的患者。
188 例食管空肠吻合术中有 5 例(2.7%)发生吻合口并发症。其中 3 例为渗漏(1.6%),2 例为狭窄(1.1%)。C 组和 L 组患者特征或血液学变量无显著差异。两组间手术时间、出血量、淋巴结清扫和术中吻合问题无显著差异。L 组(0.7%,1/139)吻合口并发症发生率明显低于 C 组(8.2%,4/49;p=0.005)。特别是 L 组的吻合口漏发生率(0.7%,1/139)低于 C 组(4.1%,2/49),但差异无统计学意义。L 组吻合口狭窄发生率(0%,0/139)明显低于 C 组(4.1%,2/49;p=0.017)。此外,多因素分析显示吻合术式是吻合口并发症的独立因素。
重叠食管空肠吻合术的吻合口并发症少于经 OrVil 吻合术的吻合口并发症,尤其是吻合口狭窄。因此,我们建议在行食管空肠吻合术时采用重叠技术。