Danjoux M F, Oksman F, Abbal M, Roques C F, Ducos J
Nouv Presse Med. 1978 Dec 30;7(47):4281-4.
In a number of cases of true rheumatoid arthritis, it is not possible to demonstrate the presence of 19 S "heavy" rheumatoid factors by the Waaler-Rose and globulin latex techniques. However, in some of them, 7 S rheumatoid factors are suspected. Three techniques for the detection of these "light" rheumatoid factors are described and critically evaluated. The authors report their own experience of the immuno-absorption and indirect immunofluorescence technique performed on 156 sera from RA patients. Immuno-absorption is not felt to be a reliable technique on several grounds. Indirect immunofluorescence is of value only in the diagnosis of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis where it provides information in addition to that offered by classical techniques. It is positive in 53.3% of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis sera.
在一些真正的类风湿性关节炎病例中,通过瓦勒 - 罗斯试验和球蛋白乳胶技术无法证明19 S“重”类风湿因子的存在。然而,其中一些病例怀疑存在7 S类风湿因子。本文描述并严格评估了三种检测这些“轻”类风湿因子的技术。作者报告了他们对156例类风湿性关节炎患者血清进行免疫吸附和间接免疫荧光技术的自身经验。基于多种原因,免疫吸附被认为不是一种可靠的技术。间接免疫荧光仅在血清阴性类风湿性关节炎的诊断中有价值,它能提供除经典技术之外的信息。在53.3%的血清阴性类风湿性关节炎血清中呈阳性。