• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Harm reduction and recovery services support (HRRSS) to mitigate the opioid overdose epidemic in a rural community.减少伤害和康复服务支持(HRRSS)以减轻农村社区阿片类药物过量流行
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Apr 19;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00532-3.
2
A rapid-cycle assessment strategy for understanding the opioid overdose epidemic in local communities.一种快速评估策略,用于了解当地社区的阿片类药物过量流行情况。
Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):888-895. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1891601. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Opioid Use Disorder Stigma and Support for Harm Reduction in Rural Counties.农村县阿片类药物使用障碍的污名化与对减少伤害的支持
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(14):1818-1828. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2250434. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
4
Characteristics of US Counties With High Opioid Overdose Mortality and Low Capacity to Deliver Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.具有高阿片类药物过量死亡率和提供阿片类药物使用障碍治疗能力低的美国县的特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e196373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6373.
5
Examining buprenorphine diversion through a harm reduction lens: an agent-based modeling study.从减少伤害的角度审视丁丙诺啡的滥用:基于代理的建模研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Oct 17;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00888-6.
6
An exploratory study of a hands-on naloxone training for rural clinicians and staff.一项针对农村临床医生和工作人员的实操型纳洛酮培训的探索性研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 May;55(3):599-604. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12841. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
7
Community-level determinants of stakeholder perceptions of community stigma toward people with opioid use disorders, harm reduction services and treatment in the HEALing Communities Study.社区层面因素对利益相关者对社区污名化、减少伤害服务和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍患者的看法的影响:HEALing 社区研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Dec;122:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104241. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
8
State- and County-Level Geographic Variation in Opioid Use Disorder, Medication Treatment, and Opioid-Related Overdose Among Medicaid Enrollees.州和县层面的医疗补助参保者阿片类使用障碍、药物治疗和阿片类药物相关过量的地域差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jun 2;4(6):e231574. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1574.
9
Attitudes toward syringe exchange programs in a rural Appalachian community.阿巴拉契亚农村社区对注射器交换项目的态度。
J Addict Dis. 2022 Apr-Jun;40(2):227-234. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2021.1979837. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
10
Strategies used to reduce harms associated with fentanyl exposure among rural people who use drugs: multi-site qualitative findings from the rural opioid initiative.用于减少农村吸毒人群中芬太尼暴露相关危害的策略:农村阿片倡议的多地点定性研究结果。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 24;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01062-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Discreet but accessible: a qualitative study with people who use drugs and service staff about the optimal design of a harm reduction vending machine in rural Kentucky.谨慎但易于获取:一项针对肯塔基州农村地区吸毒者和服务人员开展的关于减少伤害自动售货机最佳设计的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 May 28;22(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01222-y.
2
Comprehensive drug policies increase trust in local government: an analysis of authorities' and residents' perspectives in rural US Appalachian and Midwestern counties.综合药物政策增强了对地方政府的信任:对美国阿巴拉契亚和中西部农村地区县的当局和居民观点的分析。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Mar 17;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01148-x.
3
Comparative Outcomes Following Randomization to a Pilot Facebook-Based HIV Prevention Intervention Among Appalachian Women Involved in the Criminal Legal System.参与刑事法律系统的阿巴拉契亚女性被随机分配到基于脸书的艾滋病预防试点干预措施后的比较结果。
J Appalach Health. 2025 Jan 29;6(4):81-96. doi: 10.13023/jah.0604.07. eCollection 2025.
4
Fentanyl harm reduction strategies among Latinx communities in the United States: a scoping review.美国拉丁裔群体中芬太尼的危害减少策略:范围综述。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 16;21(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01070-2.
5
Naloxone Availability and Cost After Transition to an Over-the-Counter Product.纳洛酮转为非处方药后的可及性和成本。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jul 5;5(7):e241920. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1920.
6
Naloxone Accessibility by Standing Order in North Carolina Community Pharmacies.北卡罗来纳州社区药店凭医嘱即可获取纳洛酮。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024 May-Jun;64(3):102021. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021.大流行防范与新冠疫情:对2020年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间177个国家的感染率、死亡率以及与防范相关的背景因素进行的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1489-1512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Attitudes toward syringe exchange programs in a rural Appalachian community.阿巴拉契亚农村社区对注射器交换项目的态度。
J Addict Dis. 2022 Apr-Jun;40(2):227-234. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2021.1979837. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
3
Impact of an unsanctioned safe consumption site on criminal activity, 2010-2019.2010-2019 年,未批准的安全注射点对犯罪活动的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Mar 1;220:108521. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108521. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
Implementing harm reduction in non-urban communities affected by opioids and polysubstance use: A qualitative study exploring challenges and mitigating strategies.在受阿片类药物和多药物使用影响的非城市社区实施减少伤害:一项探索挑战和缓解策略的定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Apr;90:103080. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103080. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
5
Community Attitudes Toward Opioid Use Disorder and Medication for Opioid Use Disorder in a Rural Appalachian County.农村阿巴拉契亚县社区对阿片类使用障碍及阿片类使用障碍药物治疗的态度。
J Rural Health. 2021 Jan;37(1):29-34. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12503. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
6
Evaluation of an Unsanctioned Safe Consumption Site in the United States.对美国一个未经批准的安全注射点的评估。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):589-590. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2015435. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
7
A scoping review of opioid misuse in the rural United States.美国农村地区阿片类药物滥用的范围综述。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):641-652. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
8
Challenges Facing a Rural Opioid Epidemic: Treatment and Prevention of HIV and Hepatitis C.农村阿片类药物流行所面临的挑战:艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎的治疗和预防。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018 Jun;15(3):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s11904-018-0393-0.
9
Bowling alone, dying together: The role of social capital in mitigating the drug overdose epidemic in the United States.独自打保龄球,共同面对死亡:社会资本在美国缓解药物过量流行问题中的作用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Apr 1;173:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
Measuring social capital: further insights.衡量社会资本:进一步的见解。
Gac Sanit. 2017 Jan-Feb;31(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

减少伤害和康复服务支持(HRRSS)以减轻农村社区阿片类药物过量流行

Harm reduction and recovery services support (HRRSS) to mitigate the opioid overdose epidemic in a rural community.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.

Prisma Health Addiction Medicine Center, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Apr 19;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00532-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13011-023-00532-3
PMID:37076898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10114389/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rural areas in the United States (US) are ravaged by the opioid overdose epidemic. Oconee County, an entirely rural county in northwest South Carolina, is likewise severely affected. Lack of harm reduction and recovery resources (e.g., social capital) that could mitigate the worst outcomes may be exacerbating the problem. We aimed to identify demographic and other factors associated with support for harm reduction and recovery services in the community.

METHODS

The Oconee County Opioid Response Taskforce conducted a 46-item survey targeting a general population between May and June in 2022, which was mainly distributed through social media networks. The survey included demographic factors and assessed attitudes and beliefs toward individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) and medications for OUD, and support for harm reduction and recovery services, such as syringe services programs and safe consumption sites. We developed a Harm Reduction and Recovery Support Score (HRRSS), a composite score of nine items ranging from 0 to 9 to measure level of support for placement of naloxone in public places and harm reduction and recovery service sites. Primary statistical analysis using general linear regression models tested significance of differences in HRRSS between groups defined by item responses adjusting for demographic factors.

RESULTS

There were 338 survey responses: 67.5% were females, 52.1% were 55 years old or older, 87.3% were Whites, 83.1% were non-Hispanic, 53.0% were employed, and 53.8% had household income greater than US$50,000. The overall HRRSS was relatively low at a mean of 4.1 (SD = 2.3). Younger and employed respondents had significantly greater HRRSS. Among nine significant factors associated with HRRSS after adjusting for demographic factors, agreement that OUD is a disease had the greatest adjusted mean difference in HRSSS (adjusted diff = 1.22, 95% CI=(0.64, 1.80), p < 0.001), followed by effectiveness of medications for OUD (adjusted diff = 1.11, 95%CI=(0.50, 1.71), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Low HRRSS indicates low levels of acceptance of harm reduction potentially impacting both intangible and tangible social capital as it relates to mitigation of the opioid overdose epidemic. Increasing community awareness of the disease model of OUD and the effectiveness of medications for OUD, especially among older and unemployed populations, could be a step toward improving community uptake of the harm reduction and recovery service resources critical to individual recovery efforts.

摘要

背景

美国(US)农村地区深受阿片类药物过量流行的影响。南卡罗来纳州西北部的一个完全农村的奥科尼县同样受到严重影响。缺乏可能减轻最严重后果的减少伤害和恢复资源(例如社会资本)可能会使问题恶化。我们旨在确定与社区中减少伤害和恢复服务支持相关的人口统计和其他因素。

方法

奥科尼县阿片类药物反应工作队在 2022 年 5 月至 6 月期间针对一般人群进行了一项 46 项调查,主要通过社交媒体网络进行分发。该调查包括人口统计因素,并评估了对阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)个体和 OUD 药物的态度和信念,以及对减少伤害和恢复服务的支持,例如纳洛酮在公共场所的投放和减少伤害和恢复服务场所。我们开发了一个减少伤害和恢复支持评分(HRRSS),这是一个由九个项目组成的综合评分,范围从 0 到 9,用于衡量在公共场所和减少伤害和恢复服务场所放置纳洛酮以及减少伤害和恢复服务的支持程度。使用一般线性回归模型的主要统计分析测试了根据项目反应定义的组之间 HRRSS 差异的显著性,调整了人口统计因素。

结果

共有 338 份调查回复:67.5%为女性,52.1%为 55 岁或以上,87.3%为白人,83.1%为非西班牙裔,53.0%为在职人员,53.8%的家庭收入超过 50,000 美元。总体 HRRSS 相对较低,平均为 4.1(SD=2.3)。年轻和在职的受访者 HRRSS 明显更高。在调整人口统计因素后与 HRRSS 相关的九个显著因素中,同意 OUD 是一种疾病的因素对 HRSSS 的调整平均差异最大(调整差异=1.22,95%CI=(0.64,1.80),p<0.001),其次是 OUD 药物的有效性(调整差异=1.11,95%CI=(0.50,1.71),p<0.001)。

结论

低 HRRSS 表明对减少伤害的接受程度较低,这可能会对与减轻阿片类药物过量流行相关的无形和有形社会资本产生影响。提高社区对 OUD 的疾病模式和 OUD 药物有效性的认识,特别是在老年和失业人群中,可能是改善社区对减少伤害和恢复服务资源的接受度的一步,这些资源对个人的恢复努力至关重要。