• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A rapid-cycle assessment strategy for understanding the opioid overdose epidemic in local communities.一种快速评估策略,用于了解当地社区的阿片类药物过量流行情况。
Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):888-895. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1891601. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Harm reduction and recovery services support (HRRSS) to mitigate the opioid overdose epidemic in a rural community.减少伤害和康复服务支持(HRRSS)以减轻农村社区阿片类药物过量流行
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Apr 19;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00532-3.
3
"A Blessing and a Curse:" Opioid Users' Perspectives on Naloxone and the Epidemic of Opioid Overdose.“福兮祸所伏”:阿片类药物使用者对纳洛酮和阿片类药物过量流行的看法。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(8):1280-1287. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1735437. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
4
"That's why we're speaking up today": exploring barriers to overdose fatality prevention in Indianapolis' Black community with semi-structured interviews.“这就是为什么我们今天要站出来”:通过半结构化访谈探索印第安纳波利斯黑人社区中过量用药致死预防的障碍。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Oct 27;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00894-8.
5
"They're not doing enough.": women's experiences with opioids and naloxone in Toronto.“他们做得还不够。”:多伦多女性对阿片类药物和纳洛酮的体验。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Mar 20;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00360-3.
6
Beliefs Associated with Pharmacy-Based Naloxone: a Qualitative Study of Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Purchasers and People at Risk for Opioid Overdose.与药店纳洛酮相关的信念:基于药店纳洛酮购买者和阿片类药物过量风险人群的定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2019 Jun;96(3):367-378. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00349-1.
7
Simulating the Simultaneous Impact of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder and Naloxone on Opioid Overdose Death in Eight New York Counties.模拟阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗和纳洛酮同时对纽约八个县阿片类药物过量死亡的影响。
Epidemiology. 2024 May 1;35(3):418-429. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001703. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
8
Hostility, compassion and role reversal in West Virginia's long opioid overdose emergency.西弗吉尼亚州漫长的阿片类药物过量紧急事件中的敌意、同情和角色转变。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Oct 12;17(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00416-w.
9
High risk and little knowledge: overdose experiences and knowledge among young adult nonmedical prescription opioid users.高风险与低认知:年轻成年非医疗处方阿片类药物使用者的过量用药经历与认知
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Jan;26(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
10
Presence of opioid safety initiatives, prescribing patterns for opioid and naloxone, and perceived barriers to prescribing naloxone: Cross-sectional survey results based on practice type, scope, and location.阿片类药物安全措施的存在、阿片类药物和纳洛酮的处方模式,以及开具纳洛酮的感知障碍:基于实践类型、范围和地点的横断面调查结果。
J Opioid Manag. 2021 Jan-Feb;17(1):19-38. doi: 10.5055/jom.2021.0611.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to enabling rapid evaluation of innovations in health and social care: a scoping review of evidence from high-income countries.促进卫生和社会保健创新快速评估的方法:高收入国家证据的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e064345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064345.
2
Provider perceptions of medication for opioid used disorder (MOUD): A qualitative study in communities with high opioid overdose death rates.提供者对阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物的看法:在阿片类药物过量死亡率高的社区进行的定性研究。
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):742-748. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007518.

本文引用的文献

1
Drugs Most Frequently Involved in Drug Overdose Deaths: United States, 2011-2016.2011 - 2016年美国药物过量致死中最常涉及的药物
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Dec;67(9):1-14.
2
Investigating the Social Ecological Contexts of Opioid Use Disorder and Poisoning Hospitalizations in Pennsylvania.调查宾夕法尼亚州阿片类药物使用障碍和中毒住院的社会生态环境。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Nov;79(6):899-908. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.899.
3
Understanding Geographic and Neighborhood Variations in Overdose Death Rates.理解过量死亡率的地理和邻里差异。
J Community Health. 2019 Apr;44(2):272-283. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0583-0.
4
Linking Opioid-Overdose Data to Human Services and Criminal Justice Data: Opportunities for Intervention.将阿片类药物过量数据与社会服务和刑事司法数据联系起来:干预的机会。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov;133(6):658-666. doi: 10.1177/0033354918803938. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Opioid-related mortality in rural America: Geographic heterogeneity and intervention strategies.美国农村地区阿片类药物相关死亡率:地理异质性与干预策略。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 10.
6
Factors Associated With County-Level Differences in U.S. Drug-Related Mortality Rates.与美国药物相关死亡率的县际差异相关的因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 May;54(5):611-619. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.040. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
7
"There's nothing here": Deindustrialization as risk environment for overdose.“这里一无所有”:去工业化作为药物过量的风险环境
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Mar;29:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
Rapid assessment and response studies of injection drug use: knowledge gain, capacity building, and intervention development in a multisite study.注射吸毒的快速评估与应对研究:多地点研究中的知识获取、能力建设及干预措施开发
Am J Public Health. 2006 Feb;96(2):288-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.035899. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
9
Rapid assessment: an international review of diffusion, practice and outcomes in the substance use field.快速评估:物质使用领域扩散、实践与成果的国际综述
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Nov;59(9):1819-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.028.
10
Rapid assessment of the HIV/AIDS crisis in racial and ethnic minority communities: an approach for timely community interventions.种族和少数族裔社区中艾滋病毒/艾滋病危机的快速评估:及时进行社区干预的方法。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jun;93(6):970-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.6.970.

一种快速评估策略,用于了解当地社区的阿片类药物过量流行情况。

A rapid-cycle assessment strategy for understanding the opioid overdose epidemic in local communities.

机构信息

Magee Women's Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, and Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):888-895. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1891601. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1080/08897077.2021.1891601
PMID:33689674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10966462/
Abstract

Certain communities in the United States experience greater opioid-involved overdose mortality than others. Interventions to stem overdose benefit from contextual understandings of communities' needs and strengths in addressing the opioid crisis. This project aims to understand multiple stakeholder perspectives on the opioid epidemic in communities disproportionately affected by opioid-involved overdose mortality. We performed a rapid-cycle qualitative assessment study utilizing in-depth interviews with community stakeholders and observations of community meetings in eight communities in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, USA, disproportionately impacted by opioid-involved overdose mortality. Stakeholder categories included: current and past illicit users of opioids; medical and social service providers; emergency medical services; law enforcement; spouse or other family members of illicit users/former users of opioids; government officials; school officials; community members. Content analysis was utilized to identify themes and answer study questions. Regular feedback to stakeholders was provided to support targeted interventions. We performed semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 130 community stakeholders and 29 community meeting observations in 2018-2019. Participants perceived similar economic and social determinants as origins of the opioid overdose epidemic including lack of economic resources, loss of jobs, transient populations and dilapidated housing. However, they differed in their awareness of and attention to the epidemic. Awareness was dependent on the visibility of opioid use (presence of paraphernalia litter, location of drug users, media coverage, and relationship to users). Overall, there was good knowledge of naloxone for opioid overdose reversal but less knowledge about local syringe services programs. Perceptions of harm reduction efforts were ambivalent. Members of communities impacted by the opioid epidemic perceived that economic downturn was a major factor in the opioid overdose epidemic. However, the varied beliefs within and between communities suggest that interventions need to be tailored according to the cultural norms of place.

摘要

美国某些社区的阿片类药物过量死亡率高于其他社区。为了遏制过量用药,干预措施需要了解社区在应对阿片类药物危机方面的需求和优势。本项目旨在了解受阿片类药物过量死亡率不成比例影响的社区中,多个利益相关者对阿片类药物流行的看法。我们在美国宾夕法尼亚州阿勒格尼县的八个社区中进行了一项快速循环定性评估研究,利用社区利益相关者的深入访谈和社区会议观察,这些社区受到阿片类药物过量死亡率的不成比例影响。利益相关者类别包括:目前和过去的阿片类药物非法使用者;医疗和社会服务提供者;紧急医疗服务人员;执法人员;阿片类药物非法使用者/前使用者的配偶或其他家庭成员;政府官员;学校官员;社区成员。我们利用内容分析来确定主题并回答研究问题。向利益相关者提供定期反馈,以支持有针对性的干预措施。我们在 2018 年至 2019 年期间进行了半结构式深入访谈,共采访了 130 名社区利益相关者和 29 次社区会议观察。参与者认为,导致阿片类药物过量流行的经济和社会决定因素相似,包括缺乏经济资源、失业、流动人口和破旧的住房。然而,他们对疫情的认识和关注程度不同。意识取决于阿片类药物使用的可见性(存在吸毒用具、吸毒者的位置、媒体报道以及与使用者的关系)。总体而言,对于纳洛酮逆转阿片类药物过量的知识较好,但对于当地注射器服务项目的了解较少。对减少伤害措施的看法存在矛盾。受阿片类药物流行影响的社区成员认为经济下滑是阿片类药物过量流行的一个主要因素。然而,社区内部和之间的信仰差异表明,干预措施需要根据地方文化规范进行定制。