Suppr超能文献

“叫还是不叫”——儿科医院医学团队负责人的沟通偏好。

"To Call or Not to Call" Communication Preferences Among Pediatric Hospital Medicine Team Leaders.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

Hosp Pediatr. 2023 May 1;13(5):416-437. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006795.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellowship programs need to abide by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements regarding communication and supervision. Effective communication is critical for safe patient care, yet no prior research has explored optimal communication practices between residents, fellows, and attending hospitalists. Our objective is to explore communication preferences among pediatric senior residents (SRs), Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellows, and hospitalists on an inpatient team during clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey study at 6 institutions nationwide. We developed 3 complementary surveys adapted from prior research, 1 for each population: 200 hospitalists, 20 fellows, and 380 SRs. The instruments included questions about communication preferences between the SR, fellow, and hospitalist during clinical scenarios. We calculated univariate descriptive statistics and examined paired differences in percent agreement using χ2 tests, accounting for clustering by institution.

RESULTS

Response rates were: 53% hospitalists; 100% fellows; 39% SRs. Communication preferences varied based on role, scenario, and time of day. For most situations, hospitalists preferred more communication with the fellow overnight and when a patient or family is upset than expressed by fellows (P < .01). Hospitalists also desired more communication between the SR and fellow for an upset patient or family than SRs (P < .01), but all respondents agreed the SR should call the fellow for adverse events. More fellows and hospitalists felt that the SR should contact the fellow before placing a consult compared with SRs (95%, 86% vs 64%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalists, fellows, and SRs may have differing preferences regarding communication, impacting supervision, autonomy, and patient safety. Training programs should consider such perspectives when creating expectations and communication guidelines.

摘要

目的

儿科医院医学研究员课程需要遵守研究生医学教育认证委员会关于沟通和监督的要求。有效的沟通对于安全的患者护理至关重要,但之前没有研究探讨住院医师、研究员和主治医院医生之间的最佳沟通实践。我们的目标是探索住院医师、儿科医院医学研究员和住院医师在临床决策过程中进行沟通的偏好。

方法

我们在全国 6 家机构进行了一项横断面调查研究。我们根据先前的研究开发了 3 种互补的调查工具,适用于每个群体:200 名住院医师、20 名研究员和 380 名住院医师。这些工具包括在临床情景下住院医师、研究员和主治医生之间沟通偏好的问题。我们计算了单变量描述性统计数据,并使用 χ2 检验检查了百分率一致性的配对差异,同时考虑了机构聚类。

结果

回应率分别为:53%的住院医师;100%的研究员;39%的住院医师。沟通偏好因角色、情景和时间而异。对于大多数情况,住院医师在夜间和患者或家属情绪激动时更希望与研究员进行更多沟通,而不是研究员所表达的那样(P<.01)。住院医师也希望住院医师和研究员之间在患者或家属情绪激动时进行更多沟通,而不是住院医师(P<.01),但所有受访者都认为住院医师应该在发生不良事件时通知研究员。与住院医师相比,更多的研究员和住院医师认为住院医师在提出咨询前应先联系研究员(95%,86% vs 64%)。

结论

住院医师、研究员和住院医师在沟通方面可能有不同的偏好,这会影响监督、自主权和患者安全。培训计划在制定期望和沟通指南时应考虑到这些观点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验