• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难民和移民参与美国实践研究网络研究中的参与式空间:应对意料之外的优先事项。

Refugee and migrants' involvement in participatory spaces in a US practice-based research network study: Responding to unanticipated priorities.

机构信息

University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1596-1605. doi: 10.1111/hex.13764. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13764
PMID:37078650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10349241/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Refugees and migrants face suboptimal involvement in spaces for primary healthcare decision-making. Given the rising numbers of resettled refugees and migrants in primary care settings in the United States, there is an urgent need for patient-centred outcome research in practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with diverse ethnolinguistic communities. This study explored whether researchers, clinicians and patients would achieve consensus on (1) a common set of clinical problems that were applicable across a PBRN and (2) potential clinical interventions to address those problems to inform a patient-centred outcomes research (PCOR) study in a similar research network.

METHODS

In this qualitative participatory health research study, patients from diverse ethnolinguistic communities and clinicians from seven practices in a US PBRN discussed preferences for PCOR responsive to patients and the clinicians who serve them in language-discordant settings. Researchers and an advisory panel that included patients and clinicians from each participating practice held regular advisory meetings to monitor progress on project milestones and solve emerging problems. Participants took part in 10 sessions using Participatory Learning in Action and the World Café methods to identify and prioritise their ideas, using questions set for them by the advisory panel. Data were analysed based on principles of qualitative thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Participants identified common barriers in language-discordant healthcare settings, principally patient-clinician communication barriers and suggestions to overcome these barriers. A key finding was an unanticipated consensus about the need for attention to healthcare processes rather than a clinical research priority. Negotiation with research funders enabled further analysis of potential interventions for care processes to improve communication and shared decision-making in consultations and the practice as a whole.

CONCLUSION

PCOR studies should examine interventions for improving communication between patients from diverse ethnolinguistic communities and primary care staff if the sorts of harms experienced by patients experiencing language-discordant healthcare are to be reduced or prevented. Flexibility and responsiveness from funders to unanticipated findings are key structural supports for participatory health research in primary care clinical settings with this population and others who experience marginalisation and exclusion.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients and clinicians participated in the study both in the formulation of the study question, data collection, analysis and dissemination of these results; consented to their individual participation; and reviewed early drafts of the manuscript.

摘要

背景

难民和移民在初级医疗保健决策空间中的参与度不理想。鉴于在美国初级保健环境中重新安置的难民和移民人数不断增加,因此迫切需要在具有多种语言文化背景的实践基础研究网络(PBRN)中开展以患者为中心的结局研究。本研究旨在探讨研究人员、临床医生和患者是否能够就以下两个问题达成共识:(1)一套适用于整个 PBRN 的共同临床问题;(2)解决这些问题的潜在临床干预措施,以为类似研究网络中的以患者为中心的结局研究(PCOR)提供信息。

方法

在这项定性参与式健康研究中,来自美国 PBRN 的七个实践中的不同语言文化背景的患者和临床医生讨论了对患者和为语言不同的患者服务的临床医生有反应的 PCOR 的偏好。研究人员和一个咨询小组(包括来自每个参与实践的患者和临床医生)定期举行咨询会议,以监测项目里程碑的进展情况并解决新出现的问题。参与者使用参与式学习行动和世界咖啡馆方法参加了 10 次会议,以使用咨询小组为他们设定的问题来确定和优先考虑他们的想法。根据定性主题内容分析的原则对数据进行分析。

结果

参与者确定了语言不同的医疗保健环境中的共同障碍,主要是医患沟通障碍和克服这些障碍的建议。一个关键发现是,出乎意料的是,人们一致认为需要关注医疗保健流程,而不是临床研究重点。与研究资助者进行谈判,使他们能够进一步分析改善沟通和共同决策的护理流程干预措施,以改善咨询和整个实践中的沟通和共同决策。

结论

如果要减少或预防经历语言不同的医疗保健的患者所经历的伤害,PCOR 研究应检查改善来自不同语言文化背景的患者与初级保健人员之间沟通的干预措施。对于该人群和其他经历边缘化和排斥的人群来说,资金提供者的灵活性和对意外发现的响应是在具有这种人群的初级保健临床环境中进行参与式健康研究的关键结构支持。

患者或公众贡献

患者和临床医生均参与了研究,包括研究问题的制定、数据收集、分析和结果传播;同意个人参与;并审查了手稿的早期草稿。

相似文献

1
Refugee and migrants' involvement in participatory spaces in a US practice-based research network study: Responding to unanticipated priorities.难民和移民参与美国实践研究网络研究中的参与式空间:应对意料之外的优先事项。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1596-1605. doi: 10.1111/hex.13764. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Co-designing a theory-informed, multicomponent intervention to increase vaccine uptake with Congolese migrants: A qualitative, community-based participatory research study (LISOLO MALAMU).以社区为基础的参与式研究:与刚果移民共同设计一项基于理论、多组分的干预措施以提高疫苗接种率(LISOLO MALAMU)。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13884. doi: 10.1111/hex.13884. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Research prioritization in migrant health in Ireland: toward a participatory arts-based paradigm for academic primary care.爱尔兰移民健康研究重点:以参与式艺术为基础的学术初级保健范式。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Apr 1;20(20 Suppl 1):2727. doi: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2727.
4
Implementing guidelines and training initiatives to improve cross-cultural communication in primary care consultations: a qualitative participatory European study.实施指南和培训计划以改善初级保健咨询中的跨文化沟通:一项欧洲定性参与式研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 10;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0525-y.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Using Participatory Learning & Action research to access and engage with 'hard to reach' migrants in primary healthcare research.运用参与式学习与行动研究,在初级医疗保健研究中接触并吸引“难以触及”的移民群体。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 20;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1247-8.
7
"We want our freedom back, that's our only need": a qualitative study of health and social needs among asylum seekers and undocumented migrants crossing the borders from Belarus to Lithuania.“我们想要回我们的自由,这是我们唯一的需求”:一项关于从白俄罗斯越境到立陶宛的寻求庇护者和无证移民的健康和社会需求的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1371119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1371119. eCollection 2024.
8
Moving towards culturally competent health systems for migrants? Applying systems thinking in a qualitative study in Malaysia and Thailand.迈向对移民具有文化能力的卫生系统?在马来西亚和泰国的一项定性研究中应用系统思维。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 6;15(4):e0231154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231154. eCollection 2020.
9
Healthcare for migrants, participatory health research and implementation science--better health policy and practice through inclusion. The RESTORE project.移民医疗保健、参与式健康研究与实施科学——通过包容实现更好的健康政策与实践。恢复项目。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Jun;20(2):148-52. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.868432. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
10
Barriers and facilitators experienced by migrants and refugees when accessing pharmaceutical care: A scoping review.移民和难民在获得药物治疗时所经历的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Jul;19(7):977-988. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.02.016. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
What Happens to Refugees when Accessing Primary Care in the United States?: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis.美国难民在获得初级医疗保健时会发生什么?一项定性元综合研究。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s10903-025-01745-3.
2
Improving person-centered care for people with multimorbidity: the potential of participatory learning and action research.改善患有多种疾病者的以患者为中心的护理:参与式学习与行动研究的潜力
J Multimorb Comorb. 2023 Oct 25;13:26335565231207075. doi: 10.1177/26335565231207075. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Disrupting patterns of exclusion in participatory spaces: Involving people from vulnerable populations.打破参与空间中的排斥模式:让弱势群体参与进来。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2031-2033. doi: 10.1111/hex.13578. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
2
Culture and language coaching for bilingual residents: the first 10 years of the CHiCoS model.双语居民的文化和语言辅导:CHiCoS 模式的前 10 年。
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(5):589-600. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2092113. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Family Physicians Increasingly Deliver Care in Diverse Languages.
家庭医生越来越多地用多种语言提供医疗服务。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;35(1):5-6. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210190.
4
Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study.澳大利亚全科医学中针对难民背景患者的语言障碍的对策:来自 OPTIMISE 研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5.
5
Changing relationships: how does patient involvement transform professional identity? An ethnographic study.改变关系:患者参与如何改变专业身份?一项民族志研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e045520. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045520.
6
Migrants' involvement in health policy, service development and research in the WHO European Region: A narrative review of policy and practice.《移民参与世界卫生组织欧洲区域卫生政策、服务制定和研究工作:政策和实践的叙述性综述》
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Oct;26(10):1164-1176. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13643. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
7
Migrant health and language barriers: Uncovering macro level influences on the implementation of trained interpreters in healthcare settings.移民健康与语言障碍:揭示培训译员在医疗环境中的实施所受宏观层面影响
Health Policy. 2021 Aug;125(8):1085-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 May 31.
8
Power, control, communities and health inequalities I: theories, concepts and analytical frameworks.权力、控制、社区与健康不平等 I:理论、概念与分析框架。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Oct 13;36(5):1253-1263. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa133.
9
Optimising individual and community involvement in health decision-making in general practice consultations and primary care settings: A way forward.优化一般诊疗中的个人和社区在健康决策中的参与,以及初级保健环境:前进的道路。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):196-201. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1861245.
10
Barriers to the use of trained interpreters in consultations with refugees in four resettlement countries: a qualitative analysis using normalisation process theory.在四个重新安置国家的难民咨询中使用经过培训的口译员的障碍:使用规范化进程理论的定性分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 5;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01314-7.