Suppr超能文献

使用血管内超声分析比较水力压裂与单纯传统球囊血管成形术治疗钙化股总动脉病变的12个月结果。

Fracking compared to conventional balloon angioplasty alone for calcified common femoral artery lesions using intravascular ultrasound analysis: 12-month results.

作者信息

Haraguchi Takuya, Fujita Tsutomu, Kashima Yoshifumi, Tsujimoto Masanaga, Otake Ryo, Kasai Yuhei, Sato Katsuhiko

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Asia Medical Group, Sapporo Heart Center, Sapporo Cardio Vascular Clinic, North 49, East 16, 8-1, Higashi Ward, Sapporo City, Hokkaido, 007-0849, Japan.

出版信息

CVIR Endovasc. 2023 Apr 20;6(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00373-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fracking is a novel technique to crack calcified lesions by hydraulic pressure. This study aimed to compare the performance of fracking and conventional balloon angioplasty without stenting for calcified common femoral artery (CFA) lesions using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, comparative observational study included 59 patients (67 limbs) with calcified CFA lesions treated with either fracking (n = 30) or balloon angioplasty (n = 29) between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary endpoint was 1-year primary patency. The secondary endpoints included procedure success, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), procedure-related complications, and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE). Predictors of restenosis were identified using multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 403 ± 236 days. The fracking group had significantly higher incidence of 1-year primary patency (89.8% versus 49.2%, P < 0.001), procedure success (96.9% versus 74.3%, P = 0.009), and freedom from TLR (93.5% versus 74.2%, P = 0.038) than the balloon group. The rate of freedom from MALE was significantly higher in the fracking group than in the balloon group (76.9% versus 48.6%, P = 0.033). The groups had no significant difference in procedure-related complications (6.2% versus 5.7%, P = 0.928). A larger postprocedural IVUS-estimated minimum lumen area (MLA) was associated with a lower risk of restenosis (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.91; P < 0.001), with a cut-off value of 16.0 mm determined using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. The incidence of 1-year primary patency in patients with a postprocedural MLA ≥16.0 mm (n = 37) was significantly higher than that in those with a postprocedural MLA < 16.0 mm (n = 30) (87.8% versus 44.6%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the superior procedural efficacy of fracking compared to balloon angioplasty in treating calcified CFA lesions. The safety outcomes after fracking were comparable to those after balloon angioplasty. Large postprocedural MLA was an independent positive predictor of patency.

摘要

背景

水力压裂是一种通过液压破解钙化病变的新技术。本研究旨在使用血管内超声(IVUS)分析比较水力压裂与无支架常规球囊血管成形术治疗钙化股总动脉(CFA)病变的效果。

方法

这项回顾性、单中心、比较性观察研究纳入了2018年1月至2020年12月期间接受水力压裂(n = 30)或球囊血管成形术(n = 29)治疗的59例(67条肢体)钙化CFA病变患者。主要终点是1年的主要通畅率。次要终点包括手术成功率、免于靶病变血运重建(TLR)、手术相关并发症以及免于主要肢体不良事件(MALE)。使用多变量Cox比例风险分析确定再狭窄的预测因素。

结果

平均随访时间为403±236天。与球囊组相比,水力压裂组1年主要通畅率(89.8%对49.2%,P < 0.001)、手术成功率(96.9%对74.3%,P = 0.009)和免于TLR的发生率(93.5%对74.2%,P = 0.038)显著更高。水力压裂组免于MALE的发生率显著高于球囊组(76.9%对48.6%,P = 0.033)。两组在手术相关并发症方面无显著差异(6.2%对5.7%,P = 0.928)。术后IVUS估计的最小管腔面积(MLA)越大,再狭窄风险越低(风险比,0.78;95%置信区间,0.67 - 0.91;P < 0.001),使用受试者工作特征曲线分析确定的截断值为16.0 mm。术后MLA≥16.0 mm(n = 37)患者的1年主要通畅率显著高于术后MLA < 16.0 mm(n = 30)的患者(87.8%对44.6%,P < 0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,在治疗钙化CFA病变方面,水力压裂的手术效果优于球囊血管成形术。水力压裂后的安全性结果与球囊血管成形术后相当。术后大的MLA是通畅的独立阳性预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e33b/10119351/4b5e91a4769c/42155_2023_373_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验