Behavioral Sciences Department, Ruppin Academic Center.
Behavioral Sciences Department, Faculty of Social and Community Sciences, Ruppin Academic Center.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Jun;49(6):926-940. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001209. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
reflects people's tendency to evaluate objects framed positively more favorably than the same objects framed negatively. Although biased by the framing valence, evaluations are nevertheless calibrated to the magnitude of the target attribute. In three experiments that manipulated magnitudes in different ways, we examined to what extent encouraging speeded or accurate responses affected the bias of evaluations and their calibration. Results revealed a dissociation between the biasing effect of framing valence and the calibrated effect of magnitude. The bias was increased in the speeded conditions relative to the accurate conditions. However, the calibration was affected by the speed-accuracy manipulation only in negative and not in positive framing conditions. We discuss the advantage of in explaining these results, suggesting that gist representations elicit the bias, whereas verbatim representations allow calibration. However, the relative contributions of these representations to evaluation vary with task demands such as speed-accuracy requirements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
反映了人们对正面框架的对象评价比负面框架的对象评价更有利的倾向。尽管受到框架效价的影响，但评价仍然与目标属性的大小相匹配。在三个以不同方式操纵大小的实验中，我们研究了鼓励快速或准确反应在多大程度上影响了评价的偏差及其校准。结果表明，框架效价的偏差效应和大小的校准效应之间存在分离。在快速条件下，偏差相对于准确条件增加。然而，只有在负面框架条件下，而不是在正面框架条件下，速度准确性操作才会影响校准。我们讨论了在解释这些结果方面的优势，表明概要表示引起偏差，而逐字表示允许校准。然而，这些表示形式对评价的相对贡献取决于任务要求，例如速度准确性要求。
