Shah Manami, Staab Jeffrey, Anderson Ann, Eggers Scott D, Lohse Christine, McCaslin Devin L
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Am J Audiol. 2023 Nov;32(3S):721-729. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJA-22-00152. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
This study aimed to describe the relationship between changes in pre and post self-perceived dizziness handicap, scores on the patient health questionnaire, and perceptions of patient's value of being evaluated and managed by a multidisciplinary team.
Seventy-eight patients completed the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Patient Health Questionnaire-Fourth Edition (PHQ-4) questionnaires post multidisciplinary clinical consultations and testing for the chief complaints of dizziness, unsteadiness, vertigo, or balance problems. The diagnoses of each patient were recorded from the clinical reports of each specialty consultation and were classified as structural, functional, or psychiatric. They were contacted by phone at least 6 months after their visit to obtain feedback regarding their symptoms and overall patient experience.
The change in DHI total score did not differ significantly by diagnosis ( = .56), indicating that patients experienced an improvement in DHI total score regardless of diagnosis. PHQ-4 anxiety scores worsened by a mean of 0.7 points for those with structural diagnoses ( = .04), improved by a mean of 0.7 points for psychiatric diagnoses ( = .16), and improved by a mean of 0.3 points for functional diagnoses ( = .39). Only seven patients would not recommend the team to a family or friend; these patients tended to report worsening DHI total scores ( = .27) compared to the significant improvement in DHI total scores for patients who would make such a recommendation ( < .001). Similarly, only 13 patients did not feel the information they received had a positive impact; these patients tended to report worsening DHI total scores ( = .18) compared to the significant improvement in DHI total scores for patients who did feel the information had a positive impact ( < .001).
The assessment and management of patients with chronic dizziness is challenging due to symptoms arising from multiple etiologies. Our finding of a vast difference between high satisfaction and relatively unchanged dizziness handicap suggests that there is value in seeing a multidisciplinary team where consultations are unhurried, care is coordinated, and expectations regarding treatment can be managed.
本研究旨在描述自我感知的头晕障碍在治疗前后的变化、患者健康问卷得分以及患者对由多学科团队进行评估和管理的价值认知之间的关系。
78名患者在多学科临床会诊并针对头晕、不稳、眩晕或平衡问题等主要诉求进行检查后,完成了头晕障碍量表(DHI)和患者健康问卷第四版(PHQ - 4)。从各专科会诊的临床报告中记录每位患者的诊断,并分为结构性、功能性或精神性。在他们就诊至少6个月后通过电话联系,以获取有关其症状和总体患者体验的反馈。
DHI总分的变化在不同诊断之间无显著差异( = 0.56),这表明无论诊断如何,患者的DHI总分均有所改善。对于结构性诊断的患者,PHQ - 4焦虑得分平均恶化0.7分( = 0.04);对于精神性诊断的患者,平均改善0.7分( = 0.16);对于功能性诊断的患者,平均改善0.3分( = 0.39)。只有7名患者不会向家人或朋友推荐该团队;与会做出此类推荐的患者相比,这些患者的DHI总分往往报告恶化( = 0.27),而会做出推荐的患者DHI总分有显著改善( < 0.001)。同样,只有13名患者认为他们收到的信息没有产生积极影响;与认为信息有积极影响的患者相比,这些患者的DHI总分往往报告恶化( = 0.18),而认为信息有积极影响的患者DHI总分有显著改善( < 0.001)。
由于多种病因引起的症状,慢性头晕患者的评估和管理具有挑战性。我们发现高满意度与相对不变的头晕障碍之间存在巨大差异,这表明在一个会诊不匆忙、护理协调且治疗期望能够得到管理的多学科团队就诊是有价值的。