Suppr超能文献

眩晕残障程度评估量表评分在不同前庭诊断类别间的比较。

A Comparison of Dizziness Handicap Inventory Scores by Categories of Vestibular Diagnoses.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jan;42(1):129-136. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002890.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a 25-item self-report quantifying dizziness-related physical and emotional symptoms and restrictions in daily activities. DHI scores do not correlate with severity of structural vestibular deficits; thus, high DHI scores may reflect other causes of morbidity. This study investigated the relationship between total DHI scores and the presence of structural, functional, and psychiatric disorders in tertiary neurotology patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Eighty-five patients who underwent multidisciplinary neurotologic evaluations.

INTERVENTION

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Active illnesses identified by a multidisciplinary neurotology team were abstracted from medical records, cataloged as structural, functional, or psychiatric disorders, and used to group patients into diagnostic categories: structural (structural disorders only), functional (functional disorders with/without structural disorders), and psychiatric (psychiatric disorders with/without other conditions). DHI scores were compared across diagnostic categories. Sensitivities and specificities of DHI scores for identifying structural versus functional or psychiatric disorders were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean DHI scores differed significantly by diagnostic category (structural 35 ± 18, functional 64 ± 15, and psychiatric 65 ± 19), before and after adjusting for age and sex (p < 0.001, Hedges' g>1.62 for structural versus functional and psychiatric categories). DHI≤30 (mild handicap) had specificity = 0.98 for structural disorders alone, whereas DHI>60 (severe handicap) had specificity = 0.88 for functional or psychiatric disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

In this tertiary cohort, categories of illnesses had large effects on total DHI scores. Patients with scores ≤30 were likely to have structural disorders alone, whereas those with scores >60 were likely to have functional or psychiatric disorders, with or without coexisting structural conditions.

摘要

目的

眩晕障碍量表(DHI)是一个 25 项的自评量表,用于量化与眩晕相关的身体和情绪症状以及日常活动受限。DHI 评分与结构性前庭缺陷的严重程度无关;因此,高 DHI 评分可能反映了其他发病原因。本研究调查了在三级神经耳科患者中,DHI 总分与结构性、功能性和精神障碍的存在之间的关系。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

地点

三级中心。

患者

85 名接受多学科神经耳科评估的患者。

干预措施

诊断。

主要观察指标

多学科神经耳科团队从病历中提取出经确诊的活动性疾病,分类为结构性、功能性或精神性疾病,并将患者分为诊断类别:结构性(仅结构性疾病)、功能性(有/无结构性疾病的功能性疾病)和精神性(有/无其他疾病的精神性疾病)。比较不同诊断类别的 DHI 评分。计算 DHI 评分识别结构性与功能性或精神性疾病的敏感性和特异性。

结果

诊断类别之间的 DHI 评分均值差异有统计学意义(结构性 35±18、功能性 64±15 和精神性 65±19),在调整年龄和性别后差异仍有统计学意义(p<0.001,Hedges' g>1.62,结构性与功能性和精神性类别相比)。DHI≤30(轻度残疾)对单独的结构性疾病具有 0.98 的特异性,而 DHI>60(重度残疾)对功能性或精神性疾病具有 0.88 的特异性。

结论

在这个三级队列中,疾病类别对总 DHI 评分有很大影响。评分≤30 的患者很可能仅患有结构性疾病,而评分>60 的患者很可能患有功能性或精神性疾病,无论是否伴有共存的结构性疾病。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验