Suppr超能文献

开发 FXS 中改善结局的评估工具:关键利益相关者的反馈。

Developing improved outcome measures in FXS: Key stakeholder feedback.

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2023 Jun;137:104502. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104502. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a critical need for the development of improved outcome measures in Fragile X Syndrome (FXS). Because the majority of respondents of behavior outcome measures are caregivers or individuals with FXS, it is important to consider stakeholders' firsthand experiences when designing a caregiver- or self-report measure.

AIMS

The current research study aimed to understand experiences of completing commonly used caregiver-/self-report measures of behavior in FXS via focus groups.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

This study employed a focus group methodology. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 22 caregivers and 3 self-advocates. All interviews occurred via secured videoconferencing. A thematic analysis was used to identify major themes and subthemes.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

We identified four themes: (1) content of measure, (2) structure of the measure, (3) potential accommodations to complete measure, and (4) impact of measure on family. Importantly, focus groups revealed that certain aspects of content, structure, and implementation of the available measures were related to distress and negative emotions of caregivers of FXS and individuals with FXS themselves.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The focus group data yielded a wide range of feedback and has significant implications, highlighting the critical need to take key stakeholder perspectives into account when using and/or developing caregiver- or self-report measures for FXS.

摘要

背景

脆性 X 综合征(FXS)需要开发改进的预后评估方法。由于行为预后评估的大多数受访者是照顾者或 FXS 患者,因此在设计照顾者或自我报告评估工具时,考虑利益相关者的第一手经验非常重要。

目的

本研究旨在通过焦点小组了解 FXS 中常用的照顾者/自我报告行为评估工具的使用体验。

方法和程序

本研究采用焦点小组方法。对 22 名照顾者和 3 名自我倡导者进行了半结构化焦点小组访谈。所有访谈均通过安全视频会议进行。采用主题分析法确定主要主题和子主题。

结果

我们确定了四个主题:(1)评估工具的内容;(2)评估工具的结构;(3)完成评估工具的潜在调整;(4)评估工具对家庭的影响。重要的是,焦点小组揭示了现有评估工具的内容、结构和实施的某些方面与 FXS 照顾者和患者的困扰和负面情绪有关。

结论和意义

焦点小组数据提供了广泛的反馈,具有重要意义,强调在使用和/或开发 FXS 的照顾者/自我报告评估工具时,需要考虑关键利益相关者的观点。

相似文献

1
Developing improved outcome measures in FXS: Key stakeholder feedback.
Res Dev Disabil. 2023 Jun;137:104502. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104502. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Behavioral inflexibility in fragile X syndrome: Accounts from caregivers and self-advocates.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 16;14:1118652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118652. eCollection 2023.
4
A comparison of family financial and employment impacts of fragile X syndrome, autism spectrum disorders, and intellectual disability.
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Jul;35(7):1518-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 20.
5
Caregiver Preferences for the Treatment of Males with Fragile X Syndrome.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016 Jan;37(1):71-9. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000234.
6
Fragile X syndrome: economic burden and health-related quality of life of patients and caregivers in France.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 Dec;59(12):1108-20. doi: 10.1111/jir.12215. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
7
Anxiety, attention problems, hyperactivity, and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist in fragile X syndrome.
Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Jan;164A(1):141-55. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36232. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
8
Validity of a condition specific outcome measure for fragile X syndrome: the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist-utility index.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Sep;60(9):844-55. doi: 10.1111/jir.12264. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
9
Health and economic consequences of fragile X syndrome for caregivers.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(9):705-12. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318272dcbc.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the outcome maze: a scoping review of outcomes and instruments in clinical trials in genetic neurodevelopmental disorders and intellectual disability.
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2024 Apr 25;5:26330040241245721. doi: 10.1177/26330040241245721. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral inflexibility in fragile X syndrome: Accounts from caregivers and self-advocates.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 16;14:1118652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118652. eCollection 2023.
2
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on School-Aged Children with Fragile X Syndrome.
Genes (Basel). 2022 Sep 17;13(9):1666. doi: 10.3390/genes13091666.
4
Parent and Caregiver Perspectives towards Cannabidiol as a Treatment for Fragile X Syndrome.
Genes (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;13(9):1594. doi: 10.3390/genes13091594.
5
Perceived Stress among Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A State-Wide Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;16(8):1468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081468.
7
Executive Function in Fragile X Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Brain Sci. 2019 Jan 16;9(1):15. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9010015.
8
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
Authentic Engagement Of Patients And Communities Can Transform Research, Practice, And Policy.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):590-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1512.
10
Parental Stress in Families of Children With Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities.
J Child Neurol. 2015 Nov;30(13):1728-35. doi: 10.1177/0883073815579705. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验