Cross James, Yang Jui-Chen, Johnson F Reed, Quiroz Jorge, Dunn Judith, Raspa Melissa, Bailey Donald B
*Medivation, Inc., San Francisco, CA; †Pacific Economic Research, LLC, Bellevue, WA; ‡Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC; §Roche Innovation Center, New York, NY; ‖RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016 Jan;37(1):71-9. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000234.
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of intellectual disability. The objective of this study was to determine the relative importance that caregivers place on improving different phenotypic traits observed in males with FXS to better understand the greatest medical needs for developing and evaluating FXS treatments.
Fragile X syndrome caregivers (n = 614) compared hypothetical treatments in a discrete-choice experiment. The treatments varied in their effects on 6 outcomes associated with FXS: learning and applying new skills, explaining needs, controlling behavior, taking part in new social activities, caring for oneself, and paying attention. The relative importance was calculated for improving severe or moderate levels of disability and transformed to a 10-point scale. Relative importance was also quantified by patient age group (child, adolescent, and adult).
Most important to caregivers were controlling behavior (10.0) and caring for oneself (9.9). Least important was taking part in new social activities (4.2). A partial improvement in controlling behavior or self-care was more important than full resolution of the least important disabilities. This was consistent across age groups. Improvements from severe to moderate disability were more important than from moderate to no disability.
Caregivers expressed strong preferences for improvement in self-care and behavioral control, independent of the age of the individual with FXS. These data may be helpful when designing studies to test the efficacy of FXS treatments because small treatment effects on very important outcomes may be valued more than large treatment effects on less valued outcomes.
脆性X综合征(FXS)是最常见的遗传性智力残疾形式。本研究的目的是确定照顾者对于改善FXS男性患者所观察到的不同表型特征的相对重视程度,以便更好地了解开发和评估FXS治疗方法的最大医疗需求。
脆性X综合征照顾者(n = 614)在一项离散选择实验中比较了假设的治疗方法。这些治疗方法对与FXS相关的6个结果的影响各不相同:学习和应用新技能、表达需求、控制行为、参与新的社交活动、自我照顾以及集中注意力。计算了改善重度或中度残疾水平的相对重要性,并转换为10分制。还按患者年龄组(儿童、青少年和成人)对相对重要性进行了量化。
对照顾者来说最重要的是控制行为(10.0)和自我照顾(9.9)。最不重要的是参与新的社交活动(4.2)。控制行为或自我照顾的部分改善比最不重要的残疾完全解决更重要。这在各年龄组中都是一致的。从重度残疾改善到中度残疾比从中度残疾改善到无残疾更重要。
照顾者对自我照顾和行为控制的改善表达了强烈的偏好,与FXS个体的年龄无关。这些数据在设计测试FXS治疗效果的研究时可能会有所帮助,因为对非常重要的结果产生的小治疗效果可能比对不太重要的结果产生的大治疗效果更受重视。