Department of Rheumatology, MABlab ULR 4490, Université de Lille, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
Department of Rheumatology, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.
Joint Bone Spine. 2023 Sep;90(5):105574. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2023.105574. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
In response to the gradual decline in the number of prescriptions for anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) following fragility fractures, fracture liaison services (FLSs) have been set up around the world with the aim of filling this treatment gap. Several studies have already reported the benefits of such organizations, particularly in reducing fracture risk, mortality rates and healthcare costs, and literature on FLSs has increased at a steady pace over time.
A narrative review was conducted on the latest available findings on the effectiveness of FLSs. Various approaches to implementing an effective FLS program are discussed.
FLS programs have enhanced the management of osteoporosis-related fractures. However, several studies have highlighted that not all FLSs are necessarily effective in reducing subsequent fracture risk and mortality. Long-term AOM persistence and monitoring are another critical issue in FLS programs. A few studies have reported that FLSs are associated with an improvement in AOM persistence, regardless of the type of AOM. Practitioners in the FLS setting need to be aware of the impact of recency of fracture and fracture recurrence rates, and the need for timely interventions. The administration of zoledronic acid in an in-patient setting may improve AOM treatment rates in patients, who often encounter obstacles to outpatient follow-up. Introducing 'vertebral fracture identification services' in FLS programs is also an option. However, doing so leads to an increase in workload and this would need to be considered by any FLS that is considering introducing such a service. Evidence suggests that digital technologies can support (i) multidisciplinary teams in providing the best possible patient care based on current evidence, and (ii) patient self-management. However, as the methodological quality of many of the studies evaluating these technologies was poor, their validity of their results is limited.
Further research should focus on the optimal implementation of post-fracture care using automated systems, and standardized reporting of patient's characteristics and outcome measures using key performance indicators.
为了应对脆性骨折后抗骨质疏松药物(AOM)处方数量逐渐减少的情况,世界各地都设立了骨折联络服务(FLS),旨在填补这一治疗空白。已有多项研究报告了此类组织的益处,特别是在降低骨折风险、死亡率和医疗保健成本方面,随着时间的推移,有关 FLS 的文献也在稳步增加。
对最新的 FLS 有效性研究进行了叙述性综述。讨论了实施有效的 FLS 计划的各种方法。
FLS 计划改善了与骨质疏松症相关的骨折管理。然而,有几项研究强调,并非所有 FLS 都能有效降低后续骨折风险和死亡率。长期的 AOM 持续使用和监测是 FLS 计划的另一个关键问题。一些研究报告称,无论 AOM 的类型如何,FLS 都与 AOM 持续使用的改善相关。FLS 环境中的从业者需要意识到骨折发生的时间和骨折复发率的影响,以及及时干预的必要性。在住院环境中给予唑来膦酸可能会提高患者的 AOM 治疗率,因为患者在门诊随访方面经常遇到障碍。在 FLS 计划中引入“椎体骨折识别服务”也是一种选择。但是,这样做会增加工作量,任何考虑引入此类服务的 FLS 都需要考虑这一点。有证据表明,数字技术可以支持(i)多学科团队根据现有证据为患者提供最佳护理,以及(ii)患者自我管理。但是,由于评估这些技术的许多研究的方法学质量较差,其结果的有效性受到限制。
应进一步研究如何使用自动化系统优化骨折后护理的实施,并使用关键绩效指标标准化报告患者的特征和结果测量。