Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02938-8.
In the era of the internet, patients seek health information ahead of getting the required treatment. Dental implant, which is among the most sought dental treatments, is not an exception. Incorrect health related information may lead to harmful deeds, so this study sought to assess the quality of web-based Arabic health information on dental implants.
The following engines were searched: Google ( http://www.google.com ), Yahoo! ( http://www.yahoo.com ), and Bing ( http://www.bing.com ) on 13 January 2022 for specific Arabic terms on "dental implants". The first 100 consecutive websites from each engine were analyzed for eligibility. The eligible websites were assessed using JAMA benchmarks tool, DISCERN tool, and HONcode. An online tool (including FKGL, SMOG and FRE) was used to assess readability of the websites.
There were 65 eligible websites, of which only one (1.5%) was HONcode certified. Only 3 (4.5%) websites attained a high score (> 65 out of 80) based on DISCERN tool: The mean DISCERN score was 41.14 ± 12.64. The mean JAMA score was 1.69 ± 1.13; however, only five (7.6%) met all JAMA criteria. The main shortcomings were attributed to not meeting the "Attribution" (54 [83.1%]) and "Authorship" (43 [66.2%]) criteria. The mean grade level of FKGL score was 7.0 ± 4.5. The majority of the websites (60%) scored less than 7, indicating easy content to understand. The mean grade level of SMOG score required to understand a website's text was 3.2 ± 0.6. Around 91% of the websites had reading ease scores ≥ 80, suggesting that the website's content was easy to read.
Unfortunately, although readable, most of the easily accessible web-based Arabic health information on dental implants does not meet the recognized quality standards.
在互联网时代,患者在接受所需治疗之前会先寻找健康信息。牙科植入物是最受欢迎的牙科治疗方法之一,也不例外。不正确的健康相关信息可能会导致有害行为,因此本研究旨在评估基于网络的阿拉伯文牙科植入物健康信息的质量。
于 2022 年 1 月 13 日,通过谷歌(http://www.google.com)、雅虎(http://www.yahoo.com)和必应(http://www.bing.com)这三个搜索引擎,用特定的阿拉伯语搜索“dental implants”一词,搜索结果的前 100 个连续网站被分析其合格性。使用 JAMA 基准工具、DISCERN 工具和 HONcode 对合格的网站进行评估。使用在线工具(包括 FKGL、SMOG 和 FRE)评估网站的可读性。
有 65 个合格的网站,其中只有一个(1.5%)符合 HONcode 认证。只有 3 个(4.5%)网站基于 DISCERN 工具获得高分(>65 分):DISCERN 得分的平均值为 41.14±12.64。JAMA 得分的平均值为 1.69±1.13;然而,只有 5 个(7.6%)符合所有 JAMA 标准。主要的缺点归因于不符合“归属”(54 [83.1%])和“作者”(43 [66.2%])标准。FKGL 评分的平均等级为 7.0±4.5。大多数网站(60%)的得分低于 7,表明内容易于理解。SMOG 评分理解网站文本所需的平均等级为 3.2±0.6。大约 91%的网站的阅读舒适度得分≥80,表明网站的内容易于阅读。
不幸的是,虽然易于阅读,但大多数可访问的基于网络的阿拉伯文牙科植入物健康信息不符合公认的质量标准。