Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Centre for Economics of Obesity, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15592-0.
The prevalence of excess weight has been increasing globally in the last decades, affecting disproportionally adults from low socio-economic backgrounds and putting undue pressure on health systems and societal resources. In England, tackling unfair and unjust health inequalities is at the heart of national public health policy, and a prerequisite for enabling these decision makers to set policy priorities is an understanding of the prevalence and determinants of excess weight inequalities in their local population.
We conducted both pooled (England) and regional-level (nine regions: North-East, North-West, Yorkshire and Humber, East Midlands, West Midlands, East of England, London, South East and South West) analyses of individual level data from a nationally representative sample of adults (N = 6,387). We used the Corrected Concentration Index (CCI) to measure absolute inequalities in excess weight across three dimensions of socio-economic deprivation: neighbourhood-level deprivation, occupational status and educational qualification. We used a Shapley decomposition method to evaluate their relative contribution to inequality.
At a national level, all three dimensions of socio-economic deprivation were found to be positively associated with excess weight across the adult population, as measured by the CCI, with educational qualification ranking first [CCI: -0.090, p < 0.01], closely followed by neighbourhood-level deprivation [CCI: -0.050, p < 0.01]. Large variation was found between regions and genders, with inequality being either considerably higher or exclusively patterned among women. The strongest independent factor contributing to excess weight inequalities was having a long-lasting limiting illness, especially among women and towards the right tail of the excess weight spectrum. Heterogeneous patterns of contribution across the excess weight spectrum were found, however age played a dominant role toward the left tail of the distribution.
While socio-economic inequalities in excess weight exist in the English adult population, our findings underscore the importance of considering multiple dimensions of deprivation and the unique needs of different populations when developing policies to address overweight and obesity. Targeted interventions for adults with overweight and obesity with long-lasting illnesses and women can generate both short-term and long-term economic benefits, by reducing healthcare costs and increasing workforce productivity.
在过去几十年中,超重的患病率在全球范围内不断增加, disproportionately 影响来自社会经济背景较低的成年人,并给卫生系统和社会资源带来了不必要的压力。在英国,解决不公平和不公正的健康不平等问题是国家公共卫生政策的核心,这些决策者能够设定政策优先事项的前提是了解当地人口中超重不平等的流行程度和决定因素。
我们对来自全国代表性成年人样本(N=6387)的个体水平数据进行了 pooled(英格兰)和 regional-level(9 个地区:东北、西北、约克郡和亨伯、东米德兰、西米德兰、英格兰东部、伦敦、东南和西南)分析。我们使用校正集中指数(CCI)来衡量社会经济剥夺的三个维度(邻里剥夺、职业地位和教育资格)对超重的绝对不平等。我们使用 Shapley 分解方法来评估它们对不平等的相对贡献。
在全国范围内,所有三个社会经济剥夺维度都被发现与成年人的超重呈正相关,这可以通过 CCI 来衡量,其中教育资格排名第一[CCI:-0.090,p<0.01],其次是邻里剥夺[CCI:-0.050,p<0.01]。在地区和性别之间发现了很大的差异,不平等现象要么高得多,要么专门存在于女性中。对超重不平等贡献最大的独立因素是患有长期限制疾病,尤其是在女性和超重谱的右侧。然而,在超重谱的不同部分发现了贡献的异质模式,年龄在分布的左侧起着主导作用。
虽然英国成年人口中超重存在社会经济不平等,但我们的研究结果强调了在制定解决超重和肥胖问题的政策时,考虑多个剥夺维度和不同人群的独特需求的重要性。针对超重和肥胖的成年人,特别是患有长期疾病的男性和女性的有针对性的干预措施可以带来短期和长期的经济效益,降低医疗保健成本并提高劳动力生产力。