Suppr超能文献

当技术也是规范性的:基于集中指数的健康不平等衡量指标的批判性评估。

When the technical is also normative: a critical assessment of measuring health inequalities using the concentration index-based indices.

机构信息

Department of Economics and the Center for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.

出版信息

Popul Health Metr. 2022 Dec 1;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12963-022-00299-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concentration index-based measures are one of the most popular tools for estimating socioeconomic-status-related health inequalities. In recent years, several variants of the concentration index have been developed that are designed to correct for deficiencies of the standard concentration index and which are increasingly being used. These variants, which include the Wagstaff index and the Erreygers index, have important technical and normative differences.

MAIN BODY

In this study, we provide a non-technical review and critical assessment of these indices. We (i) discuss the difficulties that arise when measurement tools intended for income are applied in a health context, (ii) describe and illustrate the interrelationship between the technical and normative properties of these indices, (iii) discuss challenges that arise when determining whether index estimates are large or of policy significance, and (iv) evaluate the alignment of research practice with the properties of the indices used. Issues discussed in parts (i) and (ii) include the different conceptions of inequality that underpin the indices, the types of changes to a distribution which leave inequality unchanged and the importance of the measurement scale and range of the outcome variable. These concepts are illustrated using hypothetical examples. For parts (iii) and (iv), we reviewed 44 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2017 and find that researchers often fail to provide meaningful interpretations of the index estimates.

CONCLUSION

We propose a series of questions to facilitate further sensitivity analyses and provide a better understanding of the index estimates. We also provide a guide for researchers and policy analysts to facilitate the critical assessment of studies using these indices, while helping applied researchers to choose inequality measures that have the normative properties they seek.

摘要

背景

基于集中指数的度量方法是评估社会经济地位相关健康不平等的最流行工具之一。近年来,已经开发出几种变体的集中指数,旨在纠正标准集中指数的缺陷,并越来越多地被使用。这些变体包括 Wagstaff 指数和 Erreygers 指数,它们具有重要的技术和规范差异。

主体

在这项研究中,我们对这些指数进行了非技术性的回顾和批判性评估。我们:(i)讨论了当用于收入的测量工具应用于健康背景时出现的困难;(ii)描述并说明了这些指数的技术和规范属性之间的相互关系;(iii)讨论了在确定指数估计值是否大或具有政策意义时出现的挑战;(iv)评估了研究实践与所使用指数属性的一致性。第(i)和第(ii)部分讨论的问题包括:指数所依据的不平等概念不同、使不平等不变的分配类型变化以及测量尺度和结果变量范围的重要性。这些概念通过假设示例进行说明。对于第(iii)和第(iv)部分,我们审查了 2015 年至 2017 年间发表的 44 项实证研究,发现研究人员经常未能对指数估计值进行有意义的解释。

结论

我们提出了一系列问题,以促进进一步的敏感性分析,并更好地理解指数估计值。我们还为研究人员和政策分析师提供了一个指南,以促进对使用这些指数的研究进行批判性评估,同时帮助应用研究人员选择具有他们所寻求的规范属性的不平等衡量标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e28/9713974/9e0b1b6b10b9/12963_2022_299_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验