Shivakumar Vanishree H, Tegginamani Anand S, Zain Nurhayati M
Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Selangor, Malaysia.
Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Selangor, Malaysia.
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022 Oct-Dec;26(4):470-475. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_68_22. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
The application of traditional medicinal plants and their products for treatment has been an integral part of our culture and continues to play a key role as many infectious microorganisms are resistant to synthetic drugs. and herbs have shown medicinal properties and have gained importance in modern research.
This study assessed the antimicrobial activities of and against and to conventional medications such as chlorhexidine and nystatin.
The and were grown and maintained on Columbia agar plates and yeast malt extract agar respectively. An ethanolic extract was made and subjected to rotary evaporation to remove the ethanol. The antimicrobial activity of plant extracts was determined using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The standard drugs, 10 μg/disc nystatin and 0.12% chlorhexidine, were used as a positive control. The zone of inhibition was measured after 24 hours.
At a concentration of 3 mgs., the zone of inhibition of 25.6 mm was found with followed by 15.8 mm with against and 0.12% chlorhexidine, at 21.7 ± 0.43 mm. A zone of inhibition of 23 mm and 22.9 mm was observed in both and against respectively. Positive control of nystatin showed 26.1 ± 0.46 mm.
has better antimicrobial activity against compared to . Whereas at higher concentrations, both extracts were effective against
传统药用植物及其产品在治疗中的应用一直是我们文化的一部分,并且由于许多传染性微生物对合成药物具有抗性,其仍继续发挥关键作用。草药已显示出药用特性,并在现代研究中变得愈发重要。
本研究评估了[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]对[微生物名称1]和[微生物名称2]的抗菌活性,并与洗必泰和制霉菌素等传统药物进行比较。
[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]分别在哥伦比亚琼脂平板和酵母麦芽提取物琼脂上培养和保存。制备乙醇提取物并进行旋转蒸发以去除乙醇。使用 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法测定植物提取物的抗菌活性。标准药物,即每片含 10 μg 的制霉菌素和 0.12% 的洗必泰,用作阳性对照。24 小时后测量抑菌圈。
在浓度为 3 mg 时,[植物名称1]对[微生物名称1]的抑菌圈为 25.6 mm,其次是[植物名称2]对[微生物名称1]的抑菌圈为 15.8 mm,而 0.12% 的洗必泰对[微生物名称1]时抑菌圈为 21.7±0.43 mm。[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]对[微生物名称2]的抑菌圈分别观察到为 23 mm 和 22.9 mm。制霉菌素阳性对照显示为 26.1±0.46 mm。
与[植物名称2]相比,[植物名称1]对[微生物名称1]具有更好的抗菌活性。而在较高浓度下,两种提取物对[微生物名称2]均有效。