Barborica Andrei, Mindruta Ioana, López-Madrona Víctor J, Alario F-Xavier, Trébuchon Agnès, Donos Cristian, Oane Irina, Pistol Constantin, Mihai Felicia, Bénar Christian G
Department of Physics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, Department of Neurology, Emergency University Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Apr 4;17:1154038. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1154038. eCollection 2023.
Investigating cognitive brain functions using non-invasive electrophysiology can be challenging due to the particularities of the task-related EEG activity, the depth of the activated brain areas, and the extent of the networks involved. Stereoelectroencephalographic (SEEG) investigations in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy offer an extraordinary opportunity to validate information derived from non-invasive recordings at macro-scales. The SEEG approach can provide brain activity with high spatial specificity during tasks that target specific cognitive processes (e.g., memory). Full validation is possible only when performing simultaneous scalp SEEG recordings, which allows recording signals in the exact same brain state. This is the approach we have taken in 12 subjects performing a visual memory task that requires the recognition of previously viewed objects. The intracranial signals on 965 contact pairs have been compared to 391 simultaneously recorded scalp signals at a regional and whole-brain level, using multivariate pattern analysis. The results show that the task conditions are best captured by intracranial sensors, despite the limited spatial coverage of SEEG electrodes, compared to the whole-brain non-invasive recordings. Applying beamformer source reconstruction or independent component analysis does not result in an improvement of the multivariate task decoding performance using surface sensor data. By analyzing a joint scalp and SEEG dataset, we investigated whether the two types of signals carry complementary information that might improve the machine-learning classifier performance. This joint analysis revealed that the results are driven by the modality exhibiting best individual performance, namely SEEG.
由于任务相关脑电图活动的特殊性、激活脑区的深度以及所涉及网络的范围,使用非侵入性电生理学研究认知脑功能可能具有挑战性。对耐药性癫痫患者进行立体脑电图(SEEG)研究为验证从宏观尺度的非侵入性记录中获得的信息提供了一个绝佳机会。SEEG方法可以在针对特定认知过程(如记忆)的任务期间提供具有高空间特异性的脑活动。只有在同时进行头皮SEEG记录时才有可能进行全面验证,这使得能够在完全相同的脑状态下记录信号。这就是我们在12名执行视觉记忆任务(需要识别先前查看过的物体)的受试者中所采用的方法。使用多变量模式分析,在区域和全脑水平上,将965个接触对的颅内信号与391个同时记录的头皮信号进行了比较。结果表明,与全脑非侵入性记录相比,尽管SEEG电极的空间覆盖有限,但颅内传感器能最好地捕捉任务条件。应用波束形成器源重建或独立成分分析并不会提高使用表面传感器数据的多变量任务解码性能。通过分析联合头皮和SEEG数据集,我们研究了这两种信号是否携带可能提高机器学习分类器性能的互补信息。这种联合分析表明,结果是由表现出最佳个体性能的模态驱动的,即SEEG。