Vieira Dantas Filho Jerônimo, Perez Pedroti Vinícius, Temponi Santos Bruna Lucieny, de Lima Pinheiro Maria Mirtes, Bezerra de Mira Átila, Carlos da Silva Francisco, Soares E Silva Emerson Carlos, Cavali Jucilene, Cecilia Guedes Elica Amara, de Vargas Schons Sandro
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Rolim de Moura, RO, Brazil.
Dept. Agronomia, Universidade São Lucas (UniSL), Ji-Paraná, RO, Brazil.
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 30;9(4):e15066. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15066. eCollection 2023 Apr.
The main aimed of this study was to provide information on microplastics present in the freshwater of fish farm ponds. In addition, the study showes a relationship between the seasonal, spatial distribution and the amount of microplastics found. This study was conducted in 35 fish farms located in the Rondônia state, Brazil, the sample collects were carried out in the two Amazonian hydrological seasons (dry and rainy). The study was developed in a completely randomized factorial scheme 35 × 3 x 3 (35 fish farms, 3 ponds and 3 repetitions per ponds). Microplastic sampling was performed following a modified method based on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Samples of 250 mL freshwater collected, which were deionized and pre-filtered through 6.0 mm mesh granulometric sieves. The average abundances of the different hydrological seasons were compared by Student's -test, with differences statistically significant at p < 0.05. The microplastics were morphological categorized into fibers and colors blue, red or transparent. Microplastic contamination was confirmed in freshwater of 9 fish farming, with greater abundance of blue fibers and greater quantification in the rainy season. Fish farms P3, P4 and P6 had the highest quantifications of blue fiber in the two seasons (6 and 43, 19 and 56, 11 and 88 items mL, respectively). Almost all fish farms had a higher abundance of microplastics in the rainy season. It is important to highlight the prominence of microplastics in the blue fiber rainy season (286 items mL) compared to the dry season (58 items mL). Fish farms P3, P4 and P6 showed a strong positive correlation between the factors distance from the nearest urban area (r = 0.94, 0.79 and 0.97, respectively) and seasonality (r = 0.98, 0.77 and 0.96, respectively). Rainfall variations influenced the abundance of microplastics, especially of blue fibers. Fish farms are supplied with fresh water by rivers or streams, so it is possible that microplastics originate outside the fish farm, perhaps they were introduced due to high soil occupation, although surface runoff (of water contaminated by sewage) caused by heavy rains the most important factor. Therefore, one factor must be considered, surface runoff and groundwater contaminated by urban, agricultural and urban effluents may have contaminated rivers and streams and then contaminated the water in the fish farm ponds.
本研究的主要目的是提供有关养鱼池塘淡水中微塑料的信息。此外,该研究还显示了微塑料的季节、空间分布与发现量之间的关系。本研究在巴西朗多尼亚州的35个养鱼场进行,样本采集在亚马逊河的两个水文季节(旱季和雨季)进行。该研究采用完全随机析因设计方案35×3×3(35个养鱼场、3个池塘,每个池塘3次重复)。微塑料采样采用基于美国国家海洋和大气管理局(NOAA)的改良方法。采集250 mL淡水样本,经去离子处理并通过6.0 mm网孔粒度筛预先过滤。不同水文季节的平均丰度通过学生t检验进行比较,p<0.05时差异具有统计学意义。微塑料在形态上分为纤维,颜色为蓝色、红色或透明。在9个养鱼场的淡水中确认存在微塑料污染,蓝色纤维丰度更高,雨季的量化值更大。养鱼场P3、P4和P6在两个季节中蓝色纤维的量化值最高(分别为6和43、19和56、11和88个/毫升)。几乎所有养鱼场在雨季的微塑料丰度都更高。必须强调的是,与旱季(58个/毫升)相比,微塑料在雨季蓝色纤维中的突出程度(286个/毫升)。养鱼场P3、P4和P6显示出离最近市区的距离因素(分别为r = 0.94、0.79和0.97)与季节性因素(分别为r = 0.98、0.77和0.96)之间存在强正相关。降雨变化影响微塑料的丰度,尤其是蓝色纤维。养鱼场由河流或溪流供应淡水,因此微塑料有可能源自养鱼场之外,也许是由于土地高度开垦而引入的,尽管暴雨造成的地表径流(受污水污染的水)是最重要的因素。因此,必须考虑一个因素,即受城市、农业和城市污水污染的地表径流和地下水可能污染了河流和溪流,进而污染了养鱼池塘中的水。