Institute for Ethics, History and the Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 21;18(4):e0284698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284698. eCollection 2023.
Existential suffering is often a part of the requests for assisted suicide (AS). Its definitions have gained in clarity recently and refer to a distress arising from an inner realization that life has lost its meaning. There is however a lack of consensus on how to manage existential suffering, especially in a country where AS is legal and little is known about the difficulties faced by professionals confronted with these situations.
To explore the perspectives of Swiss professionals involved in end-of-life care and AS on the management of existential suffering when it is part of AS requests, taking into account the question of roles, as well as on the difficulties they encounter along the way and their views on the acceptability of existential suffering as a motive for AS.
A qualitative study based on face-to-face interviews was performed among twenty-five participants from the fields of palliative and primary care as well as from EXIT right-to-die organization. A semi-structured interview guide exploring four themes was used. Elements from the grounded theory approach were applied.
Almost all participants reported experiencing difficulties when facing existential suffering. Opinions regarding the acceptability of existential suffering in accessing AS were divided. Concerning its management, participants referred to the notion of being present, showing respect, seeking to understand the causes of suffering, helping give meaning, working together, psychological support, spiritual support, relieving physical symptoms and palliative sedation.
This study offers a unique opportunity to reflect on what are desirable responses to existential suffering when it is part of AS requests. Existential suffering is plural and implies a multiplicity of responses as well. These situations remain however difficult and controversial according to Swiss professionals. Clinicians' education should further address these issues and give professionals the tools to better take care of these people.
存在性痛苦通常是请求协助自杀(AS)的一部分。其定义最近变得更加清晰,是指一种由于内心意识到生命失去意义而产生的痛苦。然而,如何管理存在性痛苦仍缺乏共识,尤其是在一个 AS 合法的国家,人们对专业人士在面对这些情况时所面临的困难知之甚少。
探讨参与临终关怀和 AS 的瑞士专业人员在处理 AS 请求中存在性痛苦时的观点,考虑到角色问题,以及他们在处理过程中遇到的困难,以及他们对将存在性痛苦作为 AS 动机的可接受性的看法。
对来自姑息治疗和初级保健领域以及 EXIT 安乐死组织的 25 名参与者进行了基于面对面访谈的定性研究。使用了一个半结构化访谈指南,探讨了四个主题。应用了扎根理论方法的元素。
几乎所有参与者都报告在面对存在性痛苦时遇到困难。对于将存在性痛苦作为 AS 准入的可接受性的意见存在分歧。关于其管理,参与者提到了存在、尊重、寻求理解痛苦的原因、帮助赋予意义、共同努力、心理支持、精神支持、缓解身体症状和姑息镇静的概念。
这项研究提供了一个独特的机会来思考在 AS 请求中存在性痛苦时应如何做出理想的反应。存在性痛苦是多元的,需要多种反应。然而,根据瑞士专业人员的说法,这些情况仍然很困难和有争议。临床医生的教育应进一步解决这些问题,为专业人员提供更好地照顾这些人的工具。