Suppr超能文献

是否需要镇静?——重新思考存在性痛苦:叙事性综述。

Sedation indicated?-rethinking existential suffering: a narrative review.

机构信息

Mobile Palliative Care Team, Tiroler Hospiz-Gemeinschaft, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

Austrian Association of Palliative Care, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;13(2):397-414. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-474. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The indication "existential suffering (ES)" for palliative sedation therapy is included in most frameworks for palliative sedation and has been controversially discussed for decades. The appellative character of ES demands rapid relief and sedation often appears to be the best or only solution. ES is still poorly understood and so often neglected by health care professionals due to a lack of consensus regarding assessment, definition and treatment in the international medical literature. Based on a selective review of the literature on ES we propose a different view on the underlying processes of ES and the resulting consequences on medical treatment.

METHODS

A narrative review was performed after PubMed search using key terms related to ES and sedation, covering the period from 1950 to April 2023, additionally a selective search in specialist literature on Existential Analysis. Reverse and forward snowballing followed. The language of analyzed publications was restricted to English and German.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

ES is a multidimensional experience that tends to turn into despair and ultimately into a wish to die due to perceived hopelessness and meaninglessness. Pharmacological treatment or sedation do not meet the holistic needs of existential sufferers. The risk of harmful effects by continuous deep sedation seems to be significantly increased for existentially suffering patients. Professional caregivers are burdened by the appellative character of ES, limited treatment options and perceived empathic distress. Without a holistic understanding of the human condition in palliative care, ES cannot be fundamentally alleviated, and existential sufferers have no opportunity to transform and thus mitigate their condition. The recognition of underlying causes of suffering-moods is facilitated by the comprehensive approach of Existential Analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented concept of Existential Analysis and the triad of ES are useful instruments for health care professionals to recognize and support underlying moods of existentially suffering patients. Further studies are required. Comprehensive training for professional caregivers on ES is essential to enable them to reflect on their own existential concerns and finiteness as well as those of patients. Continuous deep sedation for ES must remain the exception, equivalent to a last resort option.

摘要

背景与目的

缓和医疗镇静疗法的适应证“存在性痛苦(ES)”包含在大多数缓和医疗镇静框架中,并在过去几十年中受到争议性讨论。ES 的称谓性质要求迅速缓解,镇静往往似乎是最佳或唯一的解决方案。由于国际医学文献中对评估、定义和治疗缺乏共识,ES 仍然理解不足,因此经常被医疗保健专业人员忽视。基于对 ES 文献的选择性回顾,我们对 ES 的潜在过程以及对医疗治疗的结果提出了不同的看法。

方法

在 PubMed 上使用与 ES 和镇静相关的关键词进行文献检索后进行叙述性综述,涵盖了 1950 年至 2023 年 4 月的时间段,此外还对存在主义分析的专业文献进行了选择性搜索。随后进行了反向和正向的滚雪球搜索。分析出版物的语言仅限于英语和德语。

主要内容和发现

ES 是一种多维体验,由于感知到的绝望和无意义,往往会转向绝望,并最终产生想死的愿望。药物治疗或镇静并不能满足存在性痛苦患者的整体需求。持续深度镇静对存在性痛苦患者的有害影响风险似乎显著增加。专业护理人员受到 ES 的称谓性质、有限的治疗选择和感知到的共情困扰的困扰。如果没有对缓和医疗中人类状况的全面理解,ES 就无法从根本上缓解,存在性痛苦患者也没有机会改变并减轻他们的病情。存在主义分析的全面方法促进了对潜在痛苦情绪的认识。

结论

所提出的存在主义分析概念和 ES 三联体是医疗保健专业人员识别和支持存在性痛苦患者潜在情绪的有用工具。需要进一步研究。对专业护理人员进行 ES 综合培训对于使他们能够反思自己的存在性担忧、有限性以及患者的担忧至关重要。持续深度镇静治疗 ES 必须仍然是例外,相当于最后手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验