Suppr超能文献

伊马替尼治疗失败后一线药物治疗晚期胃肠道间质瘤的疗效:一项网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy of post-first-line agents for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors following imatinib failure: A network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Institution of Inflammation and Immunity, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(11):12187-12197. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5912. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Imatinib is the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); however, most patients eventually develop imatinib resistance, leading to considerable clinical challenges. Few direct comparisons have been made between different post-first-line therapies on clinical efficacy in advanced GIST following imatinib failure.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholars, and Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023 were retrieved for randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of different post-first-line agents for advanced GIST following imatinib failure. Network and conventional meta-analysis were carried out using Stata/MP 16.0.

RESULTS

Ripretinib showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) rates from the 2nd to the 12th month compared to placebo, while there was virtually no evidence that the rest active agents had a significant benefit at the 12th month. Masitinib, ripretinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, and pimitespib exhibited significantly longer median PFS than placebo, and pairwise comparisons indicated there were no significant differences among masitinib, ripretinib, and sunitinib. These post-first-line agents decreased the risk of disease progression or death by 65% (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.26-0.47) compared to placebo. Ripretinib and sunitinib came into effect earlier and exhibited more consistent overall survival (OS) rate improvements than masitinib and pimitespib, while pairwise comparisons revealed no significant differences in these four active agents concerning the improvement in OS rate. These post-first-line agents decreased the risk of death by 39% (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.83) over placebo for advanced GIST following imatinib failure.

CONCLUSION

The active agents in our analysis as post-first-line therapies are able to provide superior clinical efficacy, with improved PFS rate and OS rate at certain time points, as well as absolute values of PFS and OS for advanced GIST. Ripretinib might be the optimal recommendation as a post-first-line treatment for advanced GIST following imatinib failure.

摘要

背景

伊马替尼是晚期胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的标准一线治疗药物;然而,大多数患者最终会产生伊马替尼耐药性,这给临床带来了巨大挑战。在伊马替尼耐药后,对于不同的二线治疗方案在晚期 GIST 中的临床疗效,鲜有直接比较。

方法

检索了从建立到 2023 年 2 月的 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library 等数据库,以评估伊马替尼耐药后晚期 GIST 的不同二线治疗方案的临床疗效的随机对照试验。采用 Stata/MP 16.0 进行网络和常规荟萃分析。

结果

与安慰剂相比,瑞派替尼在第 2 个月至第 12 个月的无进展生存期(PFS)率方面有显著改善,而实际上没有证据表明其他活性药物在第 12 个月有显著获益。马替昔替尼、瑞派替尼、舒尼替尼、瑞戈非尼和 Pimitespib 的中位 PFS 均显著长于安慰剂,两两比较表明马替昔替尼、瑞派替尼和舒尼替尼之间无显著差异。与安慰剂相比,这些二线治疗药物降低了 65%的疾病进展或死亡风险(HR=0.35,95%CI:0.26-0.47)。瑞派替尼和舒尼替尼比马替昔替尼和 Pimitespib 更早起效,并且在总体生存(OS)率改善方面更一致,而在这四种活性药物中,关于 OS 率的改善,两两比较没有显著差异。这些二线治疗药物降低了 39%的伊马替尼耐药后晚期 GIST 的死亡风险(HR=0.61,95%CI:0.44-0.83)。

结论

作为二线治疗药物,我们分析的活性药物能够提供更好的临床疗效,在某些时间点提高 PFS 率和 OS 率,以及提高晚期 GIST 的 PFS 和 OS 的绝对值。瑞派替尼可能是伊马替尼耐药后晚期 GIST 的最佳二线治疗推荐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0bc/10278495/f14da2bd751d/CAM4-12-12187-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验