• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一分钟的差距:在认知健康调查中应用倒计时器。

A minute makes a difference: Apply countdown timers to cognitive well-being surveys.

机构信息

Economic Sciences Department, Claremont Graduate University, United States of America.

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, United States of America.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jun;236:103914. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103914. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103914
PMID:37084475
Abstract

This paper implemented the use of countdown timers in online subjective well-being (SWB) surveys via an online experiment. The study involved 600 US residents who were equally divided into two groups: a control group and an experimental group. Both groups were posed with the same question, "All things considered; how do you rate your own life satisfaction?" However, the experimental group was subjected to a 1-minute countdown timer before submitting their responses, while the control group was not. Our findings indicate that incorporating timers into online surveys can effectively prevent participants from mis-responding by distinguishing between their affective and cognitive well-being. Furthermore, the use of timers resulted in more comprehensive responses, as participants were able to engage in deeper reflection on their life and consider a wider range of factors.

摘要

本文通过在线实验,在在线主观幸福感(SWB)调查中实现了倒计时定时器的使用。该研究涉及 600 名美国居民,他们被平均分为两组:对照组和实验组。两组都被问到同一个问题:“总的来说,你如何评价自己的生活满意度?”然而,实验组在提交回答之前被设置了 1 分钟的倒计时定时器,而对照组则没有。我们的研究结果表明,在在线调查中加入定时器可以通过区分情感和认知幸福感,有效地防止参与者误答。此外,定时器的使用产生了更全面的回答,因为参与者能够更深入地思考自己的生活,并考虑更广泛的因素。

相似文献

1
A minute makes a difference: Apply countdown timers to cognitive well-being surveys.一分钟的差距:在认知健康调查中应用倒计时器。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jun;236:103914. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103914. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
Effects of countdown timers on driver behavior after the yellow onset at Chinese intersections.倒计时器对中国交叉路口黄灯亮起后驾驶员行为的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):538-44. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.593010.
3
Roles of Indulgence versus Restraint Culture and Ability to Savor the Moment in the Link between Income and Subjective Well-Being.放纵与克制文化及即时享乐能力在收入与主观幸福感之间的关系中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 7;19(12):6995. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19126995.
4
Comparative analysis of driver's brake perception-reaction time at signalized intersections with and without countdown timer using parametric duration models.使用参数持续时间模型比较有和无倒计时器的信号交叉口驾驶员制动感知-反应时间的分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt B):448-460. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
5
Fragility of happiness moderates the influence of negative predictors of subjective well-Being.幸福感的脆弱性调节了主观幸福感的负面预测因素的影响。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 Mar;31(2):222-227. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2017.1422094. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
6
Measuring well-being in older adults: Identifying an appropriate single-item questionnaire.测量老年人的幸福感:确定一份合适的单项问卷。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Dec;21(12):1131-1137. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14298. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
Effects of digital countdown timer on intersection safety and efficiency: A systematic review.数字倒计时器对十字路口安全性和效率的影响:一项系统综述。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(1):98-103. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1043128. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
The relationships between Internet addiction, subjective vitality, and subjective happiness.网络成瘾、主观活力与主观幸福感的关系。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Aug;15(8):404-10. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0609. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
9
Life satisfaction and happiness in patients shielding from the COVID-19 global pandemic: A randomised controlled study of the 'mood as information' theory.COVID-19 大流行期间接受防护的患者的生活满意度和幸福感:“情绪即信息”理论的随机对照研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0243278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243278. eCollection 2020.
10
A validation of well-being and happiness surveys for administration via the Internet.互联网管理中幸福感和快乐感调查问卷的有效性验证。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):775-84. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.775.