The seven deadly scientific sins of clinical studies.
作者信息
Morgan P P
出版信息
CMAJ. 1986 Jun 1;134(11):1225.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The seven deadly scientific sins of clinical studies.临床研究的七宗致命科学罪过。
CMAJ. 1986 Jun 1;134(11):1225.
2
[How to improve the quality of clinical trials and their publications].
Med Clin (Barc). 1992 Feb 29;98(8):303-4.
3
[Problems with controlled clinical trials. On the way toward a different model].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1987 Oct 5;149(41):2811-4.
4
Design and analysis of controlled clinical trials in rheumatic diseases.
Clin Rheum Dis. 1983 Dec;9(3):499-514.
5
An efficient design for phase III studies of combination chemotherapies.
Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Oct;69(10):1147-54.
6
Quality and reporting of trial design in scientific papers in Anaesthesia over 25 years.25年来麻醉学领域科学论文中试验设计的质量与报告情况。
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jan;64(1):60-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05712.x. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
7
Control of data, authorship, and responsibility for clinical trials publications.临床试验出版物的数据控制、作者身份及责任
Ophthalmology. 2005 Sep;112(9):1485-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.04.007.
8
The sins of ghostwriting.代笔的罪过。
Am J Ther. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):297-8. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318180f387.
9
Commentary: publishing cancer clinical trial results: a scientific and ethical imperative.
Oncologist. 2008 Sep;13(9):930-2. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0168. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
10
Clinical trial quality needs to be improved to facilitate metaanalyses.需要提高临床试验质量以促进荟萃分析。
Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1993 Sep 11;Doc No 89:[1541 words; 14 paragraphs].
引用本文的文献
1
Appraisal of Meconium at Delivery: A look at intervention strategies.分娩时胎粪评估：干预策略探讨。
Can Fam Physician. 1992 Sep;38:2143-54.
本文引用的文献
1
Manuscript review from a statistician's perspective.
JAMA. 1985 Jun 7;253(21):3145-7.
Zotero 插件