School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of MOST for Clean Utilization of Hydrocarbon Resources, Chemical Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Use Technology of Northern Shaanxi Energy, Shaanxi Research Center of Engineering Technology for Clean Coal Conversion, Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Carbon Neutral Technology, Xi'an 710069, Shaanxi, China.
School of Chemical Engineering, Northwest University, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of MOST for Clean Utilization of Hydrocarbon Resources, Chemical Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Use Technology of Northern Shaanxi Energy, Shaanxi Research Center of Engineering Technology for Clean Coal Conversion, Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Carbon Neutral Technology, Xi'an 710069, Shaanxi, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jul 15;882:163638. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163638. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
As an abundant H-rich byproduct from coking production, coke oven gas (COG) is a favorable feedstock for ammonia production. Recently, three COG-based ammonia processes have been applied, including single process, coproduction of ammonia with methanol, and coproduction of ammonia with liquefied natural gas (LNG). To systematically evaluate the environmental impacts of three COG routes, a comparative life cycle assessment was conducted with industrial data. Besides, the effects of ammonia synthesis pressure and electricity sources to the total LCA result were discussed. The results indicate that the environmental impacts of COG-based single ammonia route are mainly generated from ammonia production stage, accounting for 69.63 % of the overall normalized results, in which electricity and COG are the dominated contributors. Therefore, employing electricity from renewables like wind, solar, hydro and nuclear could dramatically mitigate the environmental impacts with a reduction of 36.3 %-70.7 % in most environmental indicators. Scenario analysis proves that reducing synthesis pressure from 31.4 MPa to 15 MPa does not show remarkable environmental benefits as expected since higher pressure is more conducive to ammonia synthesis. In comparison with coal based and natural gas-based ammonia routes, COG routes have obvious energy-saving benefit. In three COG-based ammonia routes, the two coproduction routes accounted for 49.1 % and 78.6 % of the energy depletion as single production due to highly efficient utilization of resources and energy. Coproduction of ammonia with methanol route exhibits better environmental performance than these in coproduction of ammonia with LNG route. Therefore, coproduction of ammonia with methanol route is more favorable in COG to ammonia processes. This study intends to provide a valuable reference for COG utilization and ammonia production options through the life cycle aspect.
作为炼焦生产过程中产生的一种丰富的富氢副产品,焦炉煤气(COG)是生产氨的理想原料。最近,已经应用了三种基于 COG 的氨工艺,包括单工艺、与甲醇联产氨和与液化天然气(LNG)联产氨。为了系统地评估三种 COG 路线的环境影响,使用工业数据进行了比较生命周期评估。此外,还讨论了氨合成压力和电力来源对总 LCA 结果的影响。结果表明,基于 COG 的单氨路线的环境影响主要来自氨生产阶段,占整体归一化结果的 69.63%,其中电力和 COG 是主要贡献者。因此,采用风能、太阳能、水能和核能等可再生能源的电力可以显著减轻环境影响,在大多数环境指标中减少 36.3%-70.7%。情景分析证明,降低合成压力从 31.4MPa 到 15MPa 并不会像预期的那样带来显著的环境效益,因为较高的压力更有利于氨的合成。与煤基和天然气基氨路线相比,COG 路线具有明显的节能优势。在三种基于 COG 的氨路线中,由于资源和能源的高效利用,联产氨与甲醇路线和联产氨与 LNG 路线分别占单生产路线能源消耗的 49.1%和 78.6%。联产氨与甲醇路线的环境性能优于联产氨与 LNG 路线。因此,在 COG 到氨的过程中,联产氨与甲醇路线更有利。本研究旨在通过生命周期方面为 COG 利用和氨生产方案提供有价值的参考。