Di Zichen, Lei Feixia, Jing Jiankai, Peng Hao, Lu Xi, Cheng Fangqin
Institute of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, PR China.
School of Environment, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2024 Jan 26;21:100395. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100395. eCollection 2024 Sep.
China is the largest coke producer and consumer. There is a pressing need to address the high emissions of air pollutants and carbon dioxide associated with traditional coking production. As the nation pursues a transition towards carbon neutrality, expanding supply chains for coking plants to produce hydrogen, methanol, and other green alternatives has garnered significant attention. However, the relative advantages of these strategies have remained uncertain. In this study, we integrate a life cycle assessment-economic analysis-scenario analysis model to evaluate various coke oven gas (COG) utilization routes (COGtM: COG-to-methanol, COGtLNG: COG-to-liquefied natural gas, COGtSA: COG-to-synthetic ammonia, and COGtH: COG-to-hydrogen). The results indicate that COGtSA emerges as the preferred option for balancing environmental and economic benefits. Meanwhile, COGtM demonstrates economic viability but is associated with higher environmental impacts. Despite being recognized as a significant strategic direction under carbon neutrality initiatives, COGtH faces economic feasibility and risk resilience limitations. COGtLNG encounters both financial and environmental challenges, necessitating strategic development from an energy security perspective. The projected coking capacity is anticipated to experience a slight increase in the mid-term yet a significant decline in the long term, influenced by steel production capacity. In potential future markets, COGtM is estimated to potentially capture a maximum market share of 16-34% in the methanol market. Furthermore, against the backdrop of continuously expanding potential demand for hydrogen, COGtH holds advantages as a transitional solution, but in the long run, it can only meet a small portion of the market. COGtSA can meet 7-14% of market demand and emerges as the most viable pathway from the viewpoint of balancing environmental and economic aspects and covering future markets.
中国是最大的焦炭生产国和消费国。迫切需要解决与传统炼焦生产相关的空气污染物和二氧化碳的高排放问题。随着国家向碳中和转型,扩大炼焦厂生产氢气、甲醇和其他绿色替代品的供应链已受到广泛关注。然而,这些策略的相对优势仍不明确。在本研究中,我们整合了生命周期评估-经济分析-情景分析模型,以评估各种焦炉煤气(COG)利用路线(COGtM:COG制甲醇、COGtLNG:COG制液化天然气、COGtSA:COG制合成氨、COGtH:COG制氢气)。结果表明,COGtSA是平衡环境和经济效益的首选方案。同时,COGtM具有经济可行性,但对环境影响较大。尽管COGtH被视为碳中和倡议下的一个重要战略方向,但其面临经济可行性和风险抵御能力方面的限制。COGtLNG面临财务和环境挑战,需要从能源安全角度进行战略发展。预计炼焦产能中期将略有增加,但长期来看将因钢铁产能而大幅下降。在未来潜在市场中,估计COGtM在甲醇市场可能占据的最大市场份额为16-34%。此外,在氢气潜在需求不断扩大的背景下,COGtH作为过渡解决方案具有优势,但从长远来看,它只能满足一小部分市场需求。COGtSA可满足7-14%的市场需求,从平衡环境和经济方面以及覆盖未来市场的角度来看,是最可行的途径。