Kreps Sarah E, Kriner Douglas L
Department of Government, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
NPJ Vaccines. 2023 Apr 22;8(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s41541-023-00660-8.
Confronted with stalled vaccination efforts against COVID-19, many governments embraced mandates and other measures to incentivize vaccination that excluded the unvaccinated from aspects of social and economic life. Even still, many citizens remained unvaccinated. We advance a social contract framework for understanding who remains unvaccinated and why. We leverage both observational and individual-level survey evidence from Italy to study the relationship between vaccination status and social context, social trust, political partisanship, and adherence to core institutional structures such as the rule of law and collective commitments. We find that attitudes toward the rule of law and collective commitments outside the domain of vaccination are strongly associated with compliance with vaccine mandates and incentives. Partisanship also corresponds with vaccine behaviors, as supporters of parties whose leaders criticized aggressive policies to incentivize or mandate vaccination and emphasized individual liberty are least likely to comply. Our findings suggest appeals emphasizing individual benefits may be more effective than appeals emphasizing collective responsibility.
面对新冠疫苗接种工作停滞不前的情况,许多政府采取了强制手段和其他激励疫苗接种的措施,将未接种疫苗者排除在社会和经济生活的某些方面之外。即便如此,仍有许多公民未接种疫苗。我们提出了一个社会契约框架,以理解哪些人未接种疫苗以及原因。我们利用来自意大利的观察性证据和个人层面的调查数据,研究疫苗接种状况与社会背景、社会信任、政治党派立场以及对法治和集体承诺等核心制度结构的遵守情况之间的关系。我们发现,在疫苗接种领域之外,对法治和集体承诺的态度与遵守疫苗强制规定和激励措施密切相关。党派立场也与疫苗接种行为相关,那些领导人批评激进的激励或强制接种政策并强调个人自由的政党的支持者最不可能遵守规定。我们的研究结果表明,强调个人利益的呼吁可能比强调集体责任的呼吁更有效。