Cornell University, Department of Government, White Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Cornell University, Department of Government, White Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Vaccine. 2022 Dec 5;40(51):7460-7465. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.083. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
The spread of COVID-19 has prompted many governments, schools, and companies to institute vaccine mandates. Proponents suggest that mandates will enhance public health and increase vaccination rates. Critics suggest that evidence of mandates' effectiveness is unclear and warn that mandates risk increasing societal inequalities if unvaccinated minority groups opt out of educational, commercial, and social activities where mandates are required. We conduct an original survey experiment on a nationally representative sample of 1,245 Americans to examine the efficacy and effect of COVID-19 mandates. Our findings suggest that mandates are unlikely to change vaccination behavior overall. Further, they may increase the likelihood that sizable percentages of the population opt out of activities where vaccines are mandated. We conclude that mandates that do go into effect should be accompanied by persuasive communications targeted to specific information needs and identities.
COVID-19 的传播促使许多政府、学校和公司实施疫苗授权。支持者认为,授权将增强公共卫生并提高疫苗接种率。批评者则认为,授权的有效性证据尚不清楚,并警告说,如果未接种疫苗的少数群体选择退出需要授权的教育、商业和社会活动,授权可能会增加社会不平等。我们对 1245 名美国全国代表性样本进行了一项原始调查实验,以研究 COVID-19 授权的效果和影响。我们的研究结果表明,授权不太可能改变整体的疫苗接种行为。此外,它们可能会增加相当大比例的人口选择退出需要疫苗接种的活动的可能性。我们的结论是,确实生效的授权应该伴随着针对特定信息需求和身份的有说服力的沟通。