College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China.
Research Center of Regional Development and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Mar;34(3):742-750. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.025.
The rapid urbanization process has led to the increasingly prominent problems of ecological environment protection and optimization. The construction of ecological network system, planning to guide ecological values, and efficiently utilizing landscape effects are of great significance for regional regulation of ecological space and promotion of local sustainable development. Taking Zhengzhou metropolitan area as an example, based on land use data at eight time points from 1980 to 2020, using ArcGIS, Guidos Toolbox, Conefor and other tools, we outlined the ecological network with a high structural integrity in the study area. We used future land use simulation to predict future land pattern, morphological spatial pattern analysis to identify landscape elements, minimum cumulative resistance to construct comprehensive resistance surface, gravity model to calculate ecological gravity, hydrologic analysis to create resistance paths, and network structure evaluation, . The results showed that, among the nine source sites in the study area, the ecological sources in the Yellow River Basin connected the large-scale centralized source areas in the east and west of the network. The rest sources were located in the northeast, southeast, and southwest of the study area, which were distributed in a semi-circumferential manner around the main urban area of Zhengzhou. There were a total of 163 minimum cost paths and 58 ecological corridors, of which 10, 19 and 29 were primary, secondary and tertiary corridors, respectively, in the form of "three horizontals and three verticals" and "point-axis" along the Yellow River Basin distribution was dominant. A total of 70 ecological nodes were recored in the study area, which were divided into strategic points (10), natural ecological points (27) and artificial environment points (33). Those ecological nodes were distributed in key nodes such as the core of each source area and the intersection of corridors location. The ecological network included all the landscape elements in the study area and connected the main ecological substrates in a horizontal "C" shape. The overall performance was a semi-enclosed network structure of "one horizontal, two verticals and four groups".
快速的城市化进程导致生态环境保护和优化的问题日益突出。构建生态网络系统、规划引导生态价值、高效利用景观效应,对于区域生态空间调控和促进地方可持续发展具有重要意义。以郑州大都市区为例,基于 1980 年至 2020 年 8 个时间点的土地利用数据,利用 ArcGIS、Guidos Toolbox、Conefor 等工具,在研究区域内勾勒出具有高结构完整性的生态网络。利用未来土地利用模拟预测未来土地格局,形态空间格局分析识别景观要素,最小累积阻力构建综合阻力面,重力模型计算生态重力,水文分析创建阻力路径,以及网络结构评价。结果表明,在研究区域的 9 个源点中,黄河流域的生态源连接了网络东部和西部的大规模集中源区。其余的源点位于研究区的东北部、东南部和西南部,呈半环形分布在郑州主城区周围。共有 163 条最小成本路径和 58 条生态廊道,其中 10 条、19 条和 29 条分别为一级、二级和三级廊道,呈“三横三纵”和“点轴”形式,沿黄河流域分布为主导。研究区共记录了 70 个生态节点,分为战略节点(10 个)、自然生态节点(27 个)和人工环境节点(33 个)。这些生态节点分布在每个源区核心和廊道位置交点等关键节点。生态网络包含了研究区域内的所有景观要素,并以水平“C”形连接主要生态基质。整体表现为“一纵一横两竖四组”的半封闭网络结构。