Suppr超能文献

使用家庭尿液妊娠试验与基于医疗机构的检测对通过远程医疗提供药物流产后的结局评估的影响。

Implications of using home urine pregnancy tests versus facility-based tests for assessment of outcome following medication abortion provided via telemedicine.

作者信息

Anger Holly A, Raymond Elizabeth G

机构信息

Gynuity Health Projects, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.

Gynuity Health Projects, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2023 Aug;124:110055. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110055. Epub 2023 Apr 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether planning high-sensitivity urine pregnancy tests (HSPT) rather than facility-based tests for medication abortion follow-up may increase risk of unplanned clinical visits or procedural completion of the abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We used data from the TelAbortion Project, a 5-year study assessing the safety and feasibility of providing mifepristone and misoprostol by telemedicine and mail in the United States. We categorized participants by whether the pretreatment follow-up plan included HSPT at home 3-5 weeks after treatment or facility-based tests (ultrasound or serum human chorionic gonadotropin) within 2 weeks after treatment. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare likelihood of post-treatment unplanned, abortion-related clinical visits and procedural intervention in these groups.

RESULTS

Of 1324 patients who planned HSPT follow-up and 576 who planned facility-based tests, 85% and 83%, respectively, provided outcome information. Post-treatment clinical visits were less frequent in the HSPT group (19%) than in the facility-based test group (79%); most of the latter were to obtain the planned test. However, unplanned, abortion-related visits were significantly more common in the HSPT group (adjusted risk difference: 6.5%; p < 0.01). The likelihood of procedural completion did not differ by group. Planned follow-up test was not associated with delay in procedural completion or detection of ongoing pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up of medication abortion with home HSPT was associated with fewer post-treatment clinical visits, modestly more unplanned, abortion-related clinical visits, and no increase in the risk of procedural interventions or delayed identification or management of treatment failures. This option is an appropriate follow-up approach after medication abortion.

IMPLICATIONS

Use of home high-sensitivity pregnancy tests rather than facility-based tests for outcome assessment after medication abortion is associated with a modest increase in unplanned clinical visits but does not lead to an increase in procedural interventions or delays identification and management of treatment failure.

摘要

目的

评估在药物流产随访中计划进行高灵敏度尿妊娠试验(HSPT)而非在医疗机构进行检测是否会增加意外临床就诊或流产手术完成的风险。

研究设计

我们使用了远程流产项目的数据,这是一项为期5年的研究,评估在美国通过远程医疗和邮寄方式提供米非司酮和米索前列醇的安全性和可行性。我们根据治疗前的随访计划将参与者分为两组,一组是在治疗后3 - 5周在家中进行HSPT,另一组是在治疗后2周内在医疗机构进行检测(超声检查或血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素检测)。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来比较这些组中治疗后意外的、与流产相关的临床就诊和手术干预的可能性。

结果

在计划进行HSPT随访的1324名患者和计划进行医疗机构检测的576名患者中,分别有85%和83%提供了结局信息。HSPT组治疗后的临床就诊频率(19%)低于医疗机构检测组(79%);后者大多数是为了进行计划中的检测。然而,HSPT组中意外的、与流产相关的就诊明显更为常见(调整后的风险差异:6.5%;p < 0.01)。两组的手术完成可能性没有差异。计划中的随访检测与手术完成延迟或持续妊娠的检测无关。

结论

在家中进行HSPT对药物流产进行随访与治疗后的临床就诊次数减少相关,意外的、与流产相关的临床就诊略有增加,并且手术干预风险、治疗失败的延迟识别或管理风险没有增加。这种选择是药物流产后合适的随访方法。

启示

在药物流产后使用家用高灵敏度妊娠试验而非医疗机构检测进行结局评估与意外临床就诊的适度增加相关,但不会导致手术干预增加或治疗失败的识别和管理延迟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验