• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英雄还是隐患:对与事故发生率降低及在紧急情况下影响成功相关的个体差异的系统综述。

Hero or hazard: A systematic review of individual differences linked with reduced accident involvement and influencing success during emergencies.

作者信息

Bagley Louella, Boag-Hodgson Christine, Stainer Matthew

机构信息

Griffith University Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e15006. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15006. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15006
PMID:37089350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10113791/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to integrate previous research to gain a deeper understanding of which individual factors are associated with reduced accident involvement, and which factors may be linked to success during emergency situations when they do occur. Better understanding how the human will react in these situations, combined with technological enhancements is vital to risk mitigation and ensuring successful performance. This review will also identify gaps in the literature that have yet to be addressed.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was undertaken, beginning with 18,319 articles from three multidisciplinary databases. After careful review and exclusion, a final sample of 22 relevant articles were retained. This analysis was spread across various high risk, sociotechnical industries, including aviation, rail, mining, nuclear power, etc.

FINDINGS

The findings show that previous research has identified cognitive ability, leadership, situation awareness, personality, and risk perception as the most prominently considered factors in reducing accident involvement. Training, skill, situation awareness, and emotional stability were the most commonly associated factors to success through emergencies.

CONCLUSION

While the research around individual differences impacting success during emergencies is scarce, this review provides future direction on potential factors influencing reduced accident involvement and/or potential factors that could influence a person's success through a disaster or emergency. This information could be implemented in recruitment and training of front-line workers in high-reliability organisations to reduce risk, increase safety and work towards reducing the number of accidents.

摘要

目标

本综述旨在整合先前的研究,以更深入地了解哪些个体因素与事故发生率降低相关,以及哪些因素可能与紧急情况发生时的成功应对有关。更好地理解人类在这些情况下的反应,并结合技术改进,对于降低风险和确保成功表现至关重要。本综述还将找出文献中尚未解决的空白。

方法

进行了一项系统的文献综述,从三个多学科数据库中的18319篇文章开始。经过仔细审查和排除,最终保留了22篇相关文章的样本。该分析涵盖了各种高风险的社会技术行业,包括航空、铁路、采矿、核电等。

结果

结果表明,先前的研究已将认知能力、领导力、态势感知、个性和风险感知确定为降低事故发生率时最受关注的因素。培训、技能、态势感知和情绪稳定性是在紧急情况下成功应对最常涉及的因素。

结论

虽然关于个体差异对紧急情况下成功的影响的研究很少,但本综述为影响事故发生率降低的潜在因素和/或可能影响一个人在灾难或紧急情况下成功的潜在因素提供了未来的研究方向。这些信息可用于高可靠性组织一线员工的招聘和培训,以降低风险、提高安全性并努力减少事故数量。

相似文献

1
Hero or hazard: A systematic review of individual differences linked with reduced accident involvement and influencing success during emergencies.英雄还是隐患:对与事故发生率降低及在紧急情况下影响成功相关的个体差异的系统综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e15006. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15006. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Evacuation after a nuclear accident: Critical reviews of past nuclear accidents and proposal for future planning.核事故后人员撤离:对过去核事故的批判性回顾与未来规划建议。
Environ Int. 2021 Mar;148:106379. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106379. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
A hybrid human and organisational analysis method for railway accidents based on STAMP-HFACS and human information processing.基于 STAMP-HFACS 和人类信息处理的铁路事故混合人因分析方法
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:122-142. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
A comparison of the hazard perception ability of accident-involved and accident-free motorcycle riders.比较事故涉及和无事故摩托车骑手的危险感知能力。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jul;43(4):1464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
9
The Influence of Safety Climate, Safety Leadership, Workload, and Accident Experiences on Risk Perception: A Study of Korean Manufacturing Workers.安全氛围、安全领导力、工作负荷及事故经历对风险认知的影响:一项针对韩国制造业工人的研究
Saf Health Work. 2018 Dec;9(4):427-433. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life-threatening emergencies in hospital.医疗服务提供者的互动培训对医院危及生命的紧急情况管理的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):CD012177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012177.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
2
Decision-making in single and multiple-screen CCTV surveillance.单屏和多屏 CCTV 监控中的决策。
Appl Ergon. 2021 May;93:103383. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103383. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS).用于评估横断面研究质量的批判性评价工具(AXIS)的开发。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 8;6(12):e011458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458.
4
Cognitive Abilities, Monitoring Confidence, and Control Thresholds Explain Individual Differences in Heuristics and Biases.认知能力、监测信心和控制阈值解释了启发式和偏差中的个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1559. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01559. eCollection 2016.
5
The Automation-by-Expertise-by-Training Interaction.自动化-专业知识-培训交互作用
Hum Factors. 2017 Mar;59(2):204-228. doi: 10.1177/0018720816665459. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
Threat of resource loss: The role of self-regulation in adaptive task performance.资源损失的威胁:自我调节在适应任务表现中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Mar;101(3):450-62. doi: 10.1037/apl0000049. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
7
The role of psychological factors in workplace safety.心理因素在工作场所安全中的作用。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(12):1928-39. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.851282. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
8
The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning.知识学习教学框架:弥合科学实践鸿沟,提高学生的学习效果。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;36(5):757-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
9
The role of cognitive and visual abilities as predictors in the Multifactorial Model of Driving Safety.认知和视觉能力在驾驶安全多因素模型中的预测作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:766-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
10
General aviation accidents in degraded visibility: a case control study of 72 accidents.低能见度下的通用航空事故:一项对72起事故的病例对照研究。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Oct;77(10):1062-7.