Suppr超能文献

在一家三级医院中,由护士主导使用依托咪酯进行心房心律失常择期心脏复律的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of a nurse-led elective cardioversion with etomidate for atrial arrhythmia in a tertiary hospital.

作者信息

Zaher Wael, Pannone Luigi, Thayse Kathleen, Ebinger Klaus-Richard, Tran-Ngoc Emmanuel, de Asmundis Carlo, Chierchia Gian-Battista, Sorgente Antonio

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA, Hornu, Belgium.

Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Apr 4;9(4):e15158. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15158. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Management of cardiac arrhythmias often requires direct current cardioversion (DCC) to restore sinus rhythm. This intervention varies greatly between countries and hospitals, mostly regarding the organization of an elective DCC, and the choice of the sedation. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of an elective DCC performed in a cardiology day hospital, led by trained nurses, and using intravenous Etomidate as sedation. We performed a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary hospital in Belgium. Data were collected from January 2017 to October 2020. A total of 788 electrical cardioversions were performed on 574 patients from 2017 to 2020. Age was 70.9 ± 10 years. Restoration of sinus rhythm was obtained in 89.5% of the patients. One (0.1%) patient experienced ischemic stroke within 24 h, despite adequate anticoagulation. There were 4 (0.5%) cases of transient sinus arrest requiring atropine. Three patients (0.4%) experienced respiratory depression, requiring bag-mask ventilation but not oro-tracheal intubation. There were no cases of hypotension. No periprocedural death was reported. In conclusion, an elective electrical cardioversion performed and led by trained nurses, using Etomidate as sedation, appears to be both safe and effective.

摘要

心律失常的管理通常需要直流电复律(DCC)来恢复窦性心律。这种干预措施在不同国家和医院之间差异很大,主要体现在择期DCC的组织安排以及镇静剂的选择上。本研究的目的是评估在心脏病日间医院由经过培训的护士进行、使用静脉注射依托咪酯作为镇静剂的择期DCC的安全性和有效性。我们在比利时的一家三级医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究。数据收集时间为2017年1月至2020年10月。2017年至2020年期间,共对574例患者进行了788次电复律。患者年龄为70.9±10岁。89.5%的患者恢复了窦性心律。尽管进行了充分的抗凝治疗,但有1例(0.1%)患者在24小时内发生了缺血性中风。有4例(0.5%)短暂性窦性停搏需要使用阿托品。3例患者(0.4%)出现呼吸抑制,需要面罩通气但无需气管插管。未发生低血压病例。未报告围手术期死亡病例。总之,由经过培训的护士进行、使用依托咪酯作为镇静剂的择期电复律似乎既安全又有效。

相似文献

10

本文引用的文献

4
Propofol for sedation for direct current cardioversion.用于直流电心脏复律镇静的丙泊酚。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Apr-Jun;22(2):113-121. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_72_18.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验