Wang Xiangbin, Zhang Xinjiang, Liu Linghui, Liu Xiaowu, Feng Guorui, Wang Juan, Yin Yong-An, Wei Changzhou
College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Technical Center of Xinjiang Tianye (Group) Co., Ltd., Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Apr 5;14:1126278. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1126278. eCollection 2023.
Approximately 50% of irrigation water is saved during drip-irrigation of rice, which has tremendous potential for water-saving agriculture, particularly in areas where water resources are scarce. However, the grain yield and quality of drip-irrigated rice are adversely affected.
In this study, we investigated the effects of different irrigation strategies on the grain yield and quality of drip-irrigated rice using field experiments. Four irrigation treatments were studied: whole growing season flooding (FI), whole growing season normal drip irrigation (DI, soil relative moisture (RSM) was maintained in the range of 90-100%), pre-anthesis drip irrigation and post-anthesis water stress (SAF, the RSM was maintained in the range of 80-90% after anthesis), pre-anthesis drip irrigation, and post-anthesis flooding (FAF).
The results showed that grain yield, harvest index, seed setting rate and 1000 grain weight in DI and SAF were significantly lower than in FI and FAF. These parameters were not significantly different between FI and FAF but were significantly greater in DI than in SAF. Compared with FI and FAF, the source capacity, source activity time, and sink activity of DI and SAF decreased, and the sink-source difference increased. The sink-source difference had a significant negative correlation with rice yield and 1000 grain weight. The activities of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, starch branching enzyme, and amylopectin content in grains in the middle panicles of FAF were significantly higher than those of DI and SAF. SAF resulted in increased amylose/amylopectin ratio and total protein content in grains but decreased proportion of glutenin in total protein. Irrigation after anthesis of drip-irrigated rice narrowed the difference between sink sources in rice plants, increased the grain yield and harvest index by 29.2% and 11%, respectively, compared to DI, increased water productivity by 19% compared to FI, and improved the grain quality of drip-irrigated rice.
This study highlights that post-anthesis sufficient irrigation of drip-irrigated rice plays a positive role in maintaining the source-sink balance. This study serves as a foundation for the development of more effective rice farming methods that conserve water, while increasing the grain yield and quality of drip-irrigated rice.
水稻滴灌可节水约50%,在节水农业方面具有巨大潜力,尤其是在水资源稀缺地区。然而,滴灌水稻的产量和品质会受到不利影响。
本研究通过田间试验,探究不同灌溉策略对滴灌水稻产量和品质的影响。研究了四种灌溉处理方式:全生育期淹灌(FI)、全生育期常规滴灌(DI,土壤相对湿度(RSM)维持在90 - 100%)、抽穗前滴灌和抽穗后水分胁迫(SAF,抽穗后RSM维持在80 - 90%)、抽穗前滴灌和抽穗后淹灌(FAF)。
结果表明,DI和SAF处理的水稻产量、收获指数、结实率和千粒重显著低于FI和FAF处理。FI和FAF处理之间这些参数无显著差异,但DI处理显著高于SAF处理。与FI和FAF相比,DI和SAF处理的源容量、源活性时间和库活性降低,库源差增大。库源差与水稻产量和千粒重呈显著负相关。FAF处理中部稻穗籽粒中ADP - 葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶、淀粉分支酶活性及支链淀粉含量显著高于DI和SAF处理。SAF处理导致籽粒直链淀粉/支链淀粉比例和总蛋白含量增加,但谷蛋白占总蛋白的比例降低。滴灌水稻抽穗后灌溉缩小了水稻植株库源间的差异,与DI处理相比,产量和收获指数分别提高了29.2%和11%,与FI处理相比,水分生产率提高了19%,并改善了滴灌水稻的籽粒品质。
本研究强调了滴灌水稻抽穗后充分灌溉在维持源库平衡方面发挥的积极作用。本研究为开发更有效的节水水稻种植方法奠定了基础,同时提高了滴灌水稻的产量和品质。