He Haibing, Ma Fuyu, Yang Ru, Chen Lin, Jia Biao, Cui Jing, Fan Hua, Wang Xin, Li Li
Agricultural College, Shihezi University/Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Agricultural of Xinjiang Bingtuan, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e83103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083103. eCollection 2013.
Plastic mulching with drip irrigation is a new water-saving rice cultivation technology, but little is known on its productivity and water-saving capacity. This study aimed to assess the production potential, performance, and water use efficiency (WUE) of rice under plastic mulching with drip irrigation. Field experiments were conducted over 2 years with two rice cultivars under different cultivation systems: conventional flooding (CF), non-flooded irrigation incorporating plastic mulching with furrow irrigation (FIM), non-mulching with furrow irrigation (FIN), and plastic mulching with drip irrigation (DI). Compared with the CF treatment, grain yields were reduced by 31.76-52.19% under the DI treatment, by 57.16-61.02% under the FIM treatment, by 74.40-75.73% under the FIN treatment, which were mainly from source limitation, especially a low dry matter accumulation during post-anthesis, in non-flooded irrigation. WUE was the highest in the DI treatment, being 1.52-2.12 times higher than with the CF treatment, 1.35-1.89 times higher than with the FIM treatment, and 2.37-3.78 times higher than with the FIN treatment. The yield contribution from tillers (YCFTs) was 50.65-62.47% for the CF treatment and 12.07-20.62% for the non-flooded irrigation treatments. These low YCFTs values were attributed to the poor performance in tiller panicles rather than the total tiller number. Under non-flooded irrigation, root length was significantly reduced with more roots distributed in deep soil layers compared with the CF treatment; the DI treatment had more roots in the topsoil layer than the FIM and FIN treatments. The experiment demonstrates that the DI treatment has greater water saving capacity and lower yield and economic benefit gaps than the FIM and FIN treatments compared with the CF treatment, and would therefore be a better water-saving technology in areas of water scarcity.
覆膜滴灌是一项新的节水水稻栽培技术,但对其生产力和节水能力了解甚少。本研究旨在评估覆膜滴灌条件下水稻的生产潜力、性能及水分利用效率(WUE)。在两年时间里,针对两个水稻品种在不同栽培系统下开展了田间试验:常规淹灌(CF)、覆膜沟灌(FIM)、非覆膜沟灌(FIN)和覆膜滴灌(DI)。与CF处理相比,DI处理的籽粒产量降低了31.76 - 52.19%,FIM处理降低了57.16 - 61.02%,FIN处理降低了74.40 - 75.73%,这主要源于非淹灌条件下的源限制,尤其是花后干物质积累低。DI处理的WUE最高,比CF处理高1.52 - 2.12倍,比FIM处理高1.35 - 1.89倍,比FIN处理高2.37 - 3.78倍。CF处理的分蘖产量贡献率(YCFTs)为50.65 - 62.47%,非淹灌处理为12.07 - 20.62%。这些低YCFTs值归因于分蘖穗表现不佳,而非总分蘖数。在非淹灌条件下,与CF处理相比,根长显著缩短,更多根系分布在深层土壤;DI处理表层土壤的根系比FIM和FIN处理更多。试验表明,与CF处理相比,DI处理比FIM和FIN处理具有更大的节水能力,且产量和经济效益差距更小,因此在缺水地区是一种更好的节水技术。