Zhao Jinke, Xu Xuexin, Liu Shuai, Jia Jing, Li Menglan, Huang Hanliu, Zhang Guoqing, Zhao Changxing
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Dryland Farming Technology, College of Agronomy, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Aug 30;15:1454205. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1454205. eCollection 2024.
To examine the impacts of varied water and nitroge combinations on wheat yield and quality under drip irrigation in the Huang-Huai-Hai area, a field experiment was conducted over two growing seasons of winter wheat from 2019 to 2021.
Traditional irrigation and fertilization methods served as the control (CK), with two nitrogen application rates set: N1 (180 kg/ha) and N2 (210 kg/ha). The irrigation schedules were differentiated by growth stages: jointing, anthesis (S2); jointing, anthesis, and filling (S3); and jointing, booting, anthesis, and filling (S4), at soil depths of 0-10 cm (M1) and 0-20 cm (M2).
Results indicated that compared to CK, the 3 and 4 times irrigation treatments comprehensively improved grain yield (GY) by 8.0% and 13.6% respectively, increased the average plant partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer (PFPN) and irrigation use efficiency (IUE) by 57.5% and 38.2%, and 62.2% and 35.8%, respectively. The gluten content (GC) of 3 irrigations was 1.6% higher than CK, and other metrics such as dough tenacity (DT), softness (ST), water absorption (WAS), and gluten hardness (GH) also showed improvements. Furthermore, the contents of amylose, amylopectin, and total starch under 3 irrigations significantly increased by 9.4%, 11.4%, and 9.8%, respectively, with higher than 4 irrigations. The crude protein content and soluble sugar content in 3 irrigations rose by 6.5% and 9.8% respectively over two years. These irrigation treatments also optimized gelatinization characteristics of grains, such as breakdown viscosity (BDV), consistency peak viscosity (CPV), consistency setback viscosity (CSV), pasting temperature (PeT), and pasting time (PaT).
The study demonstrated that appropriate drip irrigation can effectively synchronize water and nitrogen supply during critical growth stages in winter wheat, ensuring robust late-stage development and efficient transfer of photosynthetic products into the grains, thus enhancing grain mass and yield. This also led to improved utilization of water and fertilizer and enhanced the nutritional and processing quality of the grain. However, excessive irrigation did not further improve grain quality. In conclusion, given the goals of saving water and fertilizer, achieving excellent yield, and ensuring high quality, the N1S3M1 treatment is recommended as an effective production management strategy in the Huang-Huai Hai area; N1S3M2 could be considered in years of water scarcity.
为研究黄淮海地区滴灌条件下不同水氮组合对冬小麦产量和品质的影响,于2019年至2021年冬小麦的两个生长季开展了田间试验。
以传统灌溉施肥方式为对照(CK),设置两个施氮量:N1(180千克/公顷)和N2(210千克/公顷)。灌溉方案根据生育期划分:拔节期、开花期(S2);拔节期、开花期、灌浆期(S3);拔节期、孕穗期、开花期、灌浆期(S4),土壤深度为0 - 10厘米(M1)和0 - 20厘米(M2)。
结果表明,与CK相比,3次和4次灌溉处理分别使籽粒产量(GY)综合提高了8.0%和13.6%,氮肥偏生产力(PFPN)和灌溉水利用效率(IUE)分别提高了57.5%和38.2%,以及62.2%和35.8%。3次灌溉处理的面筋含量(GC)比CK高1.6%,面团韧性(DT)、柔软度(ST)、吸水率(WAS)和面筋硬度(GH)等其他指标也有所改善。此外,3次灌溉处理下直链淀粉、支链淀粉和总淀粉含量分别显著增加了9.4%、11.4%和9.8%,高于4次灌溉处理。两年内,3次灌溉处理的粗蛋白含量和可溶性糖含量分别提高了6.5%和9.8%。这些灌溉处理还优化了籽粒的糊化特性,如崩解粘度(BDV)、峰值粘度(CPV)、回生粘度(CSV)、糊化温度(PeT)和糊化时间(PaT)。
研究表明,适宜的滴灌能有效使冬小麦关键生育期的水氮供应同步,确保后期稳健发育以及光合产物高效转运至籽粒中,从而增加粒重和产量。这也提高了水肥利用效率,提升了籽粒的营养和加工品质。然而,过度灌溉并未进一步改善籽粒品质。综上所述,鉴于节水节肥、实现高产和确保优质的目标,推荐N1S3M1处理作为黄淮海地区有效的生产管理策略;在缺水年份可考虑N1S3M2处理。