文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

在亲环境价值观和结果的背景下,比较时间焦点与时间重要性以衡量未来时间观。

Comparing time focus with time importance for measuring future time perspectives in the context of pro-environmental values and outcomes.

作者信息

Olsen Svein Ottar, Tuu Ho Huy, Tudoran Ana Alina

机构信息

School of Business and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Economics Faculty, Nha Trang University, Nha Trang, South Central Coast, Vietnam.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 27;14:945487. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.945487. eCollection 2023.


DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.945487
PMID:37089737
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10114413/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the area of environmental psychology, time and the temporal perspective have often been used as an overarching framework to explain or predict environmental outcomes. This study aims to introduce a new Time Importance Scale (TIS) based on the attitude strength theory and to assess its nomological validity in comparison with the more established Temporal Focus Scale (TFS) in the context of consumers' willingness to pay more for environmentally friendly products. The new TIS scale is short and simple to manage. METHOD: The study proposes competing plausible structural models testing alternative relationships between future time perspective (FTP) and environmental values using a nationwide representative survey sample of 633 Norwegians. RESULTS: The results confirm the convergent and discriminant validity of the new TIS scale. However, the direct association between the TIS scale and willingness to pay for environmentally friendly products is weak or non-significant depending on the alternative models used to validate the nomological validity. DISCUSSION: The new TIS scale provides evidence of a possible causal chain, FTP → environmental values → willingness to pay, with strong associations between the present TIS and hedonic values and between the future TIS and biospheric values. Environmental values are activated by FTP. In most cases, the new TIS outperforms the established TFS in nomological validity. Future research should validate our findings in experimental trials to demonstrate more substantial causal relationships.

摘要

引言:在环境心理学领域,时间和时间视角常被用作一个总体框架来解释或预测环境结果。本研究旨在引入一种基于态度强度理论的新的时间重要性量表(TIS),并在消费者愿意为环保产品支付更高价格的背景下,与更成熟的时间焦点量表(TFS)相比,评估其法则效度。新的TIS量表简短且易于管理。 方法:本研究提出了相互竞争的合理结构模型,使用对633名挪威人的全国代表性调查样本,测试未来时间视角(FTP)与环境价值观之间的替代关系。 结果:结果证实了新TIS量表的聚合效度和区分效度。然而,根据用于验证法则效度的替代模型,TIS量表与为环保产品支付意愿之间的直接关联较弱或不显著。 讨论:新的TIS量表提供了一条可能的因果链的证据,即FTP→环境价值观→支付意愿,当前的TIS与享乐价值观之间以及未来的TIS与生物圈价值观之间存在很强的关联。环境价值观由FTP激活。在大多数情况下,新的TIS在法则效度方面优于已有的TFS。未来的研究应在实验试验中验证我们的发现,以证明更实质性的因果关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aca7/10114413/b9a2ff9bc36a/fpsyg-14-945487-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aca7/10114413/331977390d22/fpsyg-14-945487-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aca7/10114413/b9a2ff9bc36a/fpsyg-14-945487-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aca7/10114413/331977390d22/fpsyg-14-945487-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aca7/10114413/b9a2ff9bc36a/fpsyg-14-945487-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparing time focus with time importance for measuring future time perspectives in the context of pro-environmental values and outcomes.

Front Psychol. 2023-2-27

[2]
Scale development for consumer repulsion: A consumers' individual identity-expressiveness perspective.

Psych J. 2021-8

[3]
Consumer willingness to pay more for pro-environmental packages: The moderating role of familiarity.

J Environ Manage. 2023-8-1

[4]
Influencing Factors and Group Differences of Urban Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-12-26

[5]
The convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21).

J Affect Disord. 2019-6-30

[6]
How different advertising appeals (green vs. non-green) impact consumers' willingness to pay a premium for green agricultural products.

Front Psychol. 2022-9-20

[7]
Discriminant ability and criterion validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale for cerebral palsy.

Disabil Rehabil. 2018-4-17

[8]
Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients.

North Clin Istanb. 2018-8-14

[9]
On Nomological Validity and Auxiliary Assumptions: The Importance of Simultaneously Testing Effects in Social Cognitive Theories Applied to Health Behavior and Some Guidelines.

Front Psychol. 2017-11-3

[10]
Consumers' green purchase intention to visit green hotels: A value-belief-norm theory perspective.

Front Psychol. 2023-3-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Sowing seeds for the future: Future time perspective and climate adaptation among farmers.

Br J Soc Psychol. 2025-4

[2]
Future of nature, our future. A preregistered report on future time perspective, social value orientation, and pro-environmental outcomes based on data from Poland and Sweden.

Front Psychol. 2023-12-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Psychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approach.

Front Psychol. 2021-6-24

[2]
Validation study of the Italian version of Temporal Focus Scale: psychometric properties and convergent validity.

BMC Psychol. 2021-2-1

[3]
Understanding the effects of time perspective: A meta-analysis testing a self-regulatory framework.

Psychol Bull. 2021-3

[4]
The Adolescent and Adult Time Inventory-Time Attitudes Scale: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychometric Studies.

J Pers Assess. 2021

[5]
Time Perspective Constructs in Albanian and Italian Adolescents: Exploratory Analyses.

Psychol Rep. 2021-4

[6]
The Relationship Between People's Environmental Considerations and Pro-environmental Behavior in Lithuania.

Front Psychol. 2019-10-15

[7]
The Consideration of Future Consequences: Evidence for Domain Specificity Across Five Life Domains.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020-5

[8]
Present and future temporal profiles and their relationship to health intentions and behaviors: A test on a Norwegian general population sample.

Scand J Psychol. 2019-2

[9]
Temporal focus: Thinking about the past, present, and future.

Curr Opin Psychol. 2018-4-16

[10]
Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Appl Psychol. 2018-4-23

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索