Baird Harriet M, Webb Thomas L, Sirois Fuschia M, Gibson-Miller Jilly
Department of Psychology.
Psychol Bull. 2021 Mar;147(3):233-267. doi: 10.1037/bul0000313. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
Despite extensive evidence that time perspective is associated with a range of important outcomes across a variety of life domains (e.g., health, education, wealth), the question of time perspective has such wide-reaching effects remains unknown. The present review proposes that self-regulatory processes can offer insight into why time perspective is linked to outcomes. To test this idea we classified measures of time perspective according to the dimension of time perspective that they reflected (e.g., past, present-hedonistic, future) and measures of self-regulation according to the self-regulatory process (i.e., goal setting, goal monitoring, and goal operating), ability, or outcome that they reflected. A systematic search identified 378 studies, reporting 2,000 tests of the associations between measures of time perspective and self-regulation. Random-effects meta-analyses with robust variance estimation found that a future time perspective had small-to-medium-sized positive associations with goal setting ( = 0.25), goal monitoring ( = 0.19), goal operating ( = 0.24), self-regulatory ability ( = 0.35), and outcomes ( = 0.18). Present time perspective, including being present-hedonistic and present-fatalistic, was negatively associated with self-regulatory processes, ability, and outcomes ( ranged from -0.00 to -0.27). Meta-analytic mediation models found that the relationship between future time perspective and outcomes was mediated by goal monitoring, goal operating, and self-regulatory ability, but not goal setting. As the first test of why time perspective is associated with key outcomes, the findings highlight the central role of self-regulation processes and abilities for understanding why people with certain time perspectives experience better outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管有大量证据表明时间观与生活各个领域的一系列重要结果相关(如健康、教育、财富),但时间观具有如此广泛影响的问题仍不为人知。本综述提出,自我调节过程可以为时间观为何与结果相关提供见解。为了验证这一想法,我们根据时间观所反映的维度(如过去、当前享乐主义、未来)对时间观测量进行分类,并根据自我调节过程(即目标设定、目标监控和目标执行)、能力或它们所反映的结果对自我调节测量进行分类。一项系统检索确定了378项研究,报告了2000项时间观测量与自我调节之间关联的检验。采用稳健方差估计的随机效应荟萃分析发现,未来时间观与目标设定(r = 0.25)、目标监控(r = 0.19)、目标执行(r = 0.24)、自我调节能力(r = 0.35)和结果(r = 0.18)有小到中等程度的正相关。当前时间观,包括当前享乐主义和当前宿命主义,与自我调节过程、能力和结果呈负相关(r范围为 -0.00至 -0.27)。荟萃分析中介模型发现,未来时间观与结果之间的关系由目标监控、目标执行和自我调节能力介导,但不由目标设定介导。作为对时间观为何与关键结果相关的首次检验,这些发现突出了自我调节过程和能力在理解为何具有特定时间观的人会有更好结果方面的核心作用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)
Psychol Bull. 2012-8-6
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021-9-13
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018-12-13
Am J Health Behav. 2015-9
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025-4
Healthcare (Basel). 2024-8-31