Yesantharao Lekha V, Joo Hyonoo, Wei Eric X, Lin Sandra Y, Vohra Varun, Agrawal Yuri, Galaiya Deepa
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Feb 24;8(2):409-416. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1033. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Describe demographic and professional factors predictive of burnout in academic otolaryngology before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In 2018 and 2020, cross-sectional surveys on physician wellness and burnout were distributed to faculty members of a single academic institution's otolaryngology department. Faculty were dichotomized into low and high burnout groups for 2018 ( = 8 high burnout, 19%) and 2020 ( = 11 high burnout, 37%). To identify protective factors against burnout, three semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty that reported no burnout.
Forty-two participants (59%) in 2018 and 30 out of 49 participants (62%) in 2020 completed the survey. In multivariate analysis of 2018 survey data, full and associate professors had significantly lower odds of high burnout (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00-0.53; = .03). Female gender was associated with increased in odds of high burnout (OR 15.55, 95% CI 1.86-231.74; = .02). However, academic rank and gender did not remain independent predictors of high burnout in the 2020 survey. We identified significant differences in drivers of burnout brought on by the pandemic, including a shift from a myriad of work-related stressors in 2018 to a focus on patientcare and family obligations in 2020. Interview analysis identified three themes in faculty who reported no burnout: (1) focus on helping others, (2) happiness over compensation as currency, and (3) gratitude for the ability to have an impact.
Approximately 20% of faculty reported high burnout before the pandemic, and this proportion nearly doubled during the pandemic. The risk factors and themes identified in this study may help academic otolaryngologists prevent burnout.
Factors driving burnout among academic otolaryngologists during the COVID-19 pandemic transitioned away from research, conferences, and work outside business hours toward family and patient responsibilities. Females report higher burnout and full professors report lower burnout.
III.
描述在新冠疫情之前及期间,学术性耳鼻喉科领域倦怠的人口统计学和职业因素预测指标。
在2018年和2020年,针对一所学术机构耳鼻喉科的教职员工开展了关于医生健康和倦怠的横断面调查。将教职员工分为2018年(n = 8,倦怠程度高,占19%)和2020年(n = 11,倦怠程度高,占37%)的低倦怠组和高倦怠组。为确定预防倦怠的保护因素,对报告无倦怠的教职员工进行了三次半结构化访谈。
2018年有42名参与者(59%),2020年49名参与者中有30名(62%)完成了调查。对2018年调查数据的多变量分析显示,正教授和副教授出现高倦怠的几率显著较低(比值比0.06,95%置信区间0.00 - 0.53;P = 0.03)。女性出现高倦怠的几率增加(比值比15.55,95%置信区间1.86 - 231.74;P = 0.02)。然而,在2020年的调查中,学术职称和性别不再是高倦怠的独立预测因素。我们发现疫情导致的倦怠驱动因素存在显著差异,包括从2018年众多与工作相关的压力源转变为2020年对患者护理和家庭责任的关注。访谈分析在报告无倦怠的教职员工中确定了三个主题:(1)专注于帮助他人,(2)将幸福感视为报酬,(3)感激有产生影响的能力。
在疫情之前,约20%的教职员工报告有高倦怠,在疫情期间这一比例几乎翻倍。本研究确定的风险因素和主题可能有助于学术性耳鼻喉科医生预防倦怠。
新冠疫情期间,学术性耳鼻喉科医生倦怠的驱动因素从研究、会议和非工作时间的工作转向了家庭和患者责任。女性报告的倦怠程度较高,正教授报告的倦怠程度较低。
三级