Chen Jingyu, Li Zhuojun, Wu Ting, Chen Xiumei
The 2nd Medical College of Binzhou Medical University Yantai 264000 Shandong China.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Qingdao University Yantai 264000 Shandong China.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Mar 29;8(2):508-517. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1049. eCollection 2023 Apr.
To explore whether narrow-band imaging (NBI) endoscopy is accurate in the diagnosis of malignant transformation of vocal cord leukoplakia.
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched to collect data on studies reporting the use of NBI endoscopy as a diagnostic test for diagnosing vocal cord leukoplakia from January 2015 to December 2021. Study design, analysis method, and extraction results were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The sensitivity, specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize the performance metrics of the meta-analysis. Risk of bias data and the quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2).
Nine studies were finally included in the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of NBI endoscopy for diagnosing leukoplakia lesions were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.8) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), respectively. The PLR and NLR were 10.09 (95% CI: 6.53-15.59) and 0.22 (95% CI: 0.13-0.38), respectively. The comprehensive diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 54.96 (95% CI: 24.32-124.17), and the area under the curve was 0.9584. The eight articles had a low risk of bias risk and one article was unclear.
NBI likely has good accuracy for diagnosing malignant transformation of vocal cord leukoplakia. However, multicenter studies and large samples are still needed.
探讨窄带成像(NBI)内镜检查在诊断声带白斑恶变方面是否准确。
检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库,收集2015年1月至2021年12月期间报告使用NBI内镜检查作为诊断声带白斑的诊断试验的研究数据。根据PRISMA指南进行研究设计、分析方法和提取结果。采用敏感性、特异性、合并阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和曲线下面积(AUC)来总结荟萃分析的性能指标。根据诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具(QUADAS-2)评估偏倚风险数据和纳入研究的质量。
最终纳入9项研究进行分析。荟萃分析结果显示,NBI内镜检查诊断白斑病变的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.76(95%CI:0.72-0.8)和0.93(95%CI:0.91-0.95)。PLR和NLR分别为10.09(95%CI:6.53-15.59)和0.22(95%CI:0.13-0.38)。综合诊断比值比(DOR)为54.96(95%CI:24.32-124.17),曲线下面积为0.9584。8篇文章的偏倚风险较低,1篇文章尚不清楚。
NBI在诊断声带白斑恶变方面可能具有良好的准确性。然而,仍需要多中心研究和大样本。