Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, 6035 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Speech Science, School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, M&HS Bldg 507, 28 Park Ave, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Dysphagia. 2023 Dec;38(6):1497-1510. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10576-z. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
Little is known about the physiology of a common fluid ingestion pattern-sequential swallowing. This study investigated sequential swallowing biomechanics in healthy adults. Archival normative videofluoroscopic swallow studies were analyzed for hyolaryngeal complex (HLC) patterning and biomechanical measures from the first 2 swallows of a 90-mL thin liquid sequential swallow task. The effects of age, sex, HLC type, and swallow order were explored. Eighty-eight participants were included in the primary analyses as they performed sequential swallows. HLC Type I (airway opens, epiglottis approaches baseline) and Type II (airway remains closed, epiglottis remains inverted) most commonly occurred (47% each), followed by Type III (mixed, 6%). Age was significantly associated with Type II and longer hypopharyngeal transit, total pharyngeal transit (TPT), swallow reaction time (SRT), and duration to maximum hyoid elevation. Males demonstrated significantly greater maximum hyoid displacement (Hmax) and longer duration of maximum hyoid displacement. Significantly larger maximum hyoid-to-larynx approximation was linked to the first swallow, while the subsequent swallow had significantly longer oropharyngeal transit, TPT, and SRT. Secondary analyses included an additional 91 participants who performed a series of discrete swallows for the same swallow task. Type II had significantly greater Hmax than Type I and series of discrete swallows. Sequential swallowing biomechanics differ from discrete swallows, and normal variance exists among healthy adults. In vulnerable populations, sequential swallowing may challenge swallow coordination and airway protection. Normative data allow comparison to dysphagic populations. Systematic efforts are needed to further standardize a definition for sequential swallowing.
人们对常见的液体摄入模式——顺序吞咽的生理学知之甚少。本研究旨在调查健康成年人的顺序吞咽生物力学。对存档的正常吞咽荧光透视研究进行分析,以了解喉咽复合体(HLC)模式和 90ml 稀薄液体顺序吞咽任务前 2 次吞咽的生物力学测量值。研究了年龄、性别、HLC 类型和吞咽顺序的影响。88 名参与者被纳入主要分析,因为他们进行了顺序吞咽。最常见的 HLC 类型为 I 型(气道打开,会厌接近基线)和 II 型(气道保持关闭,会厌保持倒置)(各占 47%),其次是 III 型(混合,占 6%)。年龄与 II 型和更长的咽后区通过时间、总咽通过时间(TPT)、吞咽反应时间(SRT)和最大舌骨提升持续时间显著相关。男性的最大舌骨位移(Hmax)显著更大,最大舌骨位移持续时间也更长。最大舌骨与喉的最大接近度与第一次吞咽显著相关,而随后的吞咽的口咽通过时间、TPT 和 SRT 显著更长。次要分析包括另外 91 名参与者进行相同吞咽任务的一系列离散吞咽。与 I 型和离散吞咽相比,II 型的 Hmax 显著更大。顺序吞咽的生物力学与离散吞咽不同,健康成年人之间存在正常的变异性。在脆弱人群中,顺序吞咽可能会挑战吞咽协调和气道保护。正常数据允许与吞咽困难人群进行比较。需要系统地努力进一步规范顺序吞咽的定义。