• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国护士计费岗位胜任力评价指标体系的构建:一项德尔菲研究

Development of billing post competency evaluation index system for nurses in China: a Delphi study.

作者信息

Liu Jiao, Qiu Huifang, Zhang Xiaohong, Zhang Cuiling, He Fang, Yan Pan

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030032, China.

General Surgery Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2023 Apr 25;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01301-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-023-01301-0
PMID:37098520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10127390/
Abstract

AIM

This study developed a set of competency evaluation indicators for billing nurses in China.

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, nurses often take up billing responsibilities that are accompanied by certain risks. However, the competency evaluation index system for billing nurses has not been established in China.

METHODS

This study consisted of two main phases of research design: the first phase included a literature review and semi-structured interviews. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 nurses in billing departments and 15 nurse managers in related departments. Concepts distilled from the literature review were linked to the results of the semi-structured interviews; this phase produced the first draft of indicators for assessing the professional competence of nurses in billing departments. In the second phase, two rounds of correspondence were conducted with 20 Chinese nursing experts using the Delphi method to test and evaluate the content of the index. The consensus was defined in advance as a mean score of 4.0 or above, with at least 75% agreement among participants. In this way, the final indicator framework was determined.

RESULTS

Using the iceberg model as a theoretical foundation, the literature review identified four main dimensions and associated themes. The semi-structured interviews confirmed all of the themes from the literature review while generating new themes, both of which were incorporated into the first draft of the index. Then two rounds of the Delphi survey were conducted. The positive coefficients of experts in the two rounds were 100% and 95%, respectively, while the authority coefficients were 0.963 and 0.961, respectively. The coefficients of variation were 0.00-0.33 and 0.05-0.24, respectively. The competency evaluation index system for billing nurses consisted of 4 first-level indicators, 16 s-level indicators, and 53 third-level indicators.

CONCLUSION

The competency evaluation index system for billing nurses, which was developed on the basis of the iceberg model, was scientific and applicable.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

The competency assessment index system for billing nurses may provide an effective practical framework for nursing administration to evaluate, train, and assess the competency of billing nurses.

摘要

目的

本研究构建了一套适用于中国计费护士的能力评估指标。

背景

在临床实践中,护士常承担计费职责,且伴随一定风险。然而,我国尚未建立计费护士能力评估指标体系。

方法

本研究包括两个主要研究设计阶段:第一阶段包括文献回顾和半结构化访谈。对12名计费部门护士和15名相关部门护士长进行了个体半结构化访谈。将文献回顾中提炼的概念与半结构化访谈结果相联系;此阶段得出了评估计费部门护士专业能力指标的初稿。在第二阶段,运用德尔菲法与20名中国护理专家进行两轮函询,以测试和评估指标内容。预先将共识定义为平均得分4.0及以上,且参与者之间至少75%达成一致。以此确定了最终的指标框架。

结果

以冰山模型为理论基础,文献回顾确定了四个主要维度及相关主题。半结构化访谈证实了文献回顾中的所有主题,同时产生了新主题,二者均被纳入指标初稿。随后进行了两轮德尔菲调查。两轮专家积极系数分别为100%和95%,权威系数分别为0.963和0.961。变异系数分别为0.00 - 0.33和0.05 - 0.24。计费护士能力评估指标体系由4个一级指标、16个二级指标和53个三级指标组成。

结论

基于冰山模型构建的计费护士能力评估指标体系科学且适用。

对护理管理的启示

计费护士能力评估指标体系可为护理管理评估、培训和考核计费护士的能力提供有效的实践框架。

相似文献

1
Development of billing post competency evaluation index system for nurses in China: a Delphi study.中国护士计费岗位胜任力评价指标体系的构建:一项德尔菲研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Apr 25;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01301-0.
2
Construction of a competency index system for shift nurses in China: A Delphi study.构建中国轮班护士胜任力指标体系的德尔菲研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Aug;10(8):5638-5648. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1809. Epub 2023 May 16.
3
Construction of an index system of core competence assessment for sleep medicine nurse specialists in China: a Delphi study.构建中国睡眠医学专科护士核心能力评价指标体系:一项德尔菲研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 27;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02349-2.
4
Construction of a competency evaluation index system for front-line nurses during the outbreak of major infectious diseases: A Delphi study.重大传染病疫情期间一线护士胜任力评价指标体系的构建:德尔菲法研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 1;17(7):e0270902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270902. eCollection 2022.
5
Development and validation of a competency evaluation index system for nurse endoscopists with different stages performing endoscopy nursing in China: A modified Delphi study.中国不同阶段内镜护理护士内镜护理能力评价指标体系的构建与验证:改良 Delphi 法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Jan;144:106411. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106411. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Development of training program for the Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat emergency nurses in China based on core competency: a Delphi study.基于核心能力的中国耳鼻咽喉科急诊护士培训方案的制定: 德尔菲法研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01032-8.
7
A core competency evaluation index system for the graded use of clinical nurse specialists: A Delphi study.临床护理专家分级使用的核心能力评价指标体系:德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):3101-3114. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17200. Epub 2024 May 19.
8
Construction of an evaluation index system of core competencies for critical care blood purification nurses in China: A Delphi study.中国重症护理血液净化护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建:一项德尔菲研究
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103751. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103751. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
9
Construction of an index system of core competence assessment for infectious disease specialist nurse in China: a Delphi study.构建我国传染病专科护士核心能力评价指标体系:德尔菲法研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 10;21(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06402-2.
10
Developing a psychological care competences framework for nurses in China: a mixed methods study.构建中国护士心理护理能力框架:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Feb 19;23(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01778-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of competency model for civil aviation flight dispatchers with integrated approach combining grounded theory and structural equation modeling.基于扎根理论与结构方程模型相结合的综合方法构建民航飞行签派员胜任力模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08679-8.
2
Development and validation of an evaluation index system of health education competence for dental nurses in China: a mixed methods study.中国口腔护士健康教育能力评价指标体系的构建与验证:一项混合方法研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 1;24(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03107-8.
3
Exploring nursing assistants' competencies in pressure injury prevention and management in nursing homes: a qualitative study using the iceberg model.探索养老院护理助理在压力性损伤预防与管理方面的能力:一项运用冰山模型的定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 27;24(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02911-6.
4
Barriers to implementation of preoperative urostomy site marking in nurse-physician cooperation: A qualitative study based on the Theoretical Domains Framework.护士 - 医生合作中术前造口部位标记实施的障碍:一项基于理论领域框架的定性研究
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Dec 17;12:100634. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100634. eCollection 2025 Dec.
5
Development of the Competency Evaluation Scale for Clinical Nutritionists in China: A Delphi Study.中国临床营养师胜任力评价量表的研制:德尔菲法研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 6;16(16):2593. doi: 10.3390/nu16162593.
6
Development and validation of a scale for the assessment of the knowledge-attitude-practice of parents towards children snoring.父母对儿童打鼾的知识-态度-行为评估量表的编制与验证。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 8;25(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02360-1.
7
Developing a psychological care competences framework for nurses in China: a mixed methods study.构建中国护士心理护理能力框架:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Feb 19;23(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01778-3.
8
Common domains of nurses' competencies in public health emergencies: a scoping review.公共卫生紧急事件中护士能力的常见领域:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2023 Dec 21;22(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01655-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of trends in nurse practitioner billing for emergency medical services: 2015-2018.分析 2015-2018 年执业护士在急诊医疗服务中的计费趋势。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec;62:78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.09.040. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Educating APRN Students About Telehealth Credentialing, Licensing, and Billing.教育 APRN 学生有关远程医疗认证、许可和计费的知识。
J Nurs Educ. 2022 Jul;61(7):413-416. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20220613-07. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
A systematic review of outpatient billing practices.门诊计费实践的系统评价。
SAGE Open Med. 2022 May 23;10:20503121221099021. doi: 10.1177/20503121221099021. eCollection 2022.
4
Legislation Increased Medicare Telestroke Billing, But Underbilling And Erroneous Billing Remain Common.立法增加了联邦医疗保险远程卒中计费,但低计费和错误计费仍然很常见。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Mar;41(3):350-359. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00791.
5
Wading through Molasses: A qualitative examination of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Australian medical practitioners regarding medical billing.在糖浆中跋涉:对澳大利亚执业医师在医疗计费方面的经验、看法、态度和知识的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262211. eCollection 2022.
6
An Update on Billing and Coding for the Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.精神科-心理健康护士从业者的计费和编码更新。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2022 Feb;60(2):11-13. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20210819-01. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
7
The Delphi method at a glance.德尔菲法简介。
Pflege. 2021 Aug;34(4):221. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000812.
8
Educational needs of medical practitioners about medical billing: a scoping review of the literature.医学从业者关于医疗计费的教育需求:文献综述的范围界定。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Jul 15;19(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00631-x.
9
Establishing Performance Evaluation for Quality Inspection of Specialty Nurses.建立专科护士质量检查的绩效评估。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2021;35(4):180-187. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000604.
10
Costs of nursing procedures/interventions: an integrative literature review.护理程序/干预措施的成本:综合文献回顾。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Oct 28;73(suppl 6):e20190351. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0351. eCollection 2020.