Author Affiliations: Clinical Medical Research Center (Ms Cai) and Nursing Department (Mss S. Zheng, Huang, Z. Zheng, Xu, Wu, and Zhou), Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shantou, China.
Clin Nurse Spec. 2021;35(4):180-187. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000604.
The present study aimed to establish an index system for the performance evaluation of specialty nurses (SNs) in tertiary hospitals.
An objective index system for performance evaluation of SN has not yet been established in China.
A 2-round Delphi survey sought opinions from experts about the index system for SNs' performance evaluation in tertiary hospitals in China.
Delphi survey was used to inquire approximately 20 experts from the fields of nursing management, nursing education, and clinical nursing. We determined the weight coefficient of each index of performance evaluation based on the opinion. Finally, the index of the quality evaluation was established for SN.
A total of 20 experts from 10 provinces in China reached a consensus on the tertiary indexes of the assessment model. The indexes contained first-level (4), second-level (16), and third-level (24) indicators. The 4 aspects of the performance evaluation, including clinical specialist practice assessment, nursing research, education assessment, medical cooperation recognition, and personal comprehensive ability assessment, reached consensus.
Establishing the performance evaluation for SNs aided the SNs in achieving the best clinical practice after training. The performance evaluation still needed to be continuously improved.
本研究旨在建立三级医院专科护士（SN）绩效评估指标体系。
中国尚未建立 SN 绩效评估的客观指标体系。
两轮德尔菲调查征求了来自护理管理、护理教育和临床护理领域的约 20 名专家对中国三级医院 SN 绩效评估指标体系的意见。
采用德尔菲法，向来自全国 10 个省的 20 名专家咨询，确定绩效评估各指标的权重系数。最终为 SN 建立了质量评价指标。
中国的 20 名专家就评估模型的三级指标达成共识。该指标包含一级（4 个）、二级（16 个）和三级（24 个）指标。临床专科实践评估、护理研究、教育评估、医疗合作认可和个人综合能力评估这 4 个方面的绩效评估达成共识。
建立 SN 的绩效评估有助于 SN 在培训后实现最佳临床实践。该绩效评估仍需不断改进。
