Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Sep;75(9):1608-1618. doi: 10.1002/art.42510. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
This phase 3 study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenabasum, a cannabinoid type 2 receptor agonist, in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc).
A multinational double-blind study was conducted in 365 dcSSc patients who were randomized and dosed 1:1:1 with lenabasum 20 mg, lenabasum 5 mg, or placebo, each twice daily and added to background treatments, including immunosuppressive therapies (IST).
The primary end point, the American College of Rheumatology combined response index in dcSSc (CRISS) at week 52 for lenabasum 20 mg twice a day versus placebo, was not met, with CRISS score of 0.888 versus 0.887 (P = 0.4972, using mixed models repeated measures [MMRM]). The change in the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) at week 52 for lenabasum 20 mg twice a day versus placebo was -6.7 versus -8.1 (P = 0.1183, using MMRM). Prespecified analyses showed higher CRISS scores, greater improvement in MRSS, and lower decline in forced vital capacity in patients on background mycophenolate and those who were taking IST for ≤1 year. No deaths or excess in serious or severe adverse events related to lenabasum were observed.
A benefit of lenabasum in dcSSc was not demonstrated. Most patients were treated with background IST, and treatment with mycophenolate mofetil in particular was associated with better outcomes. These findings support the use of IST in the treatment of dcSSc and highlight the challenge of demonstrating a treatment effect when investigational treatment is added to standard of care IST. These findings have relevance to trial design in SSc, as well as to clinical care.
本 3 期研究旨在评估大麻素 2 型受体激动剂 lenabasum 治疗弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症(dcSSc)患者的疗效和安全性。
一项多中心、双盲研究纳入了 365 例 dcSSc 患者,他们被随机分为 lenabasum 20mg、lenabasum 5mg 和安慰剂组,1:1:1 分组,每日两次给药,联合背景治疗(包括免疫抑制疗法(IST))。
lenabasum 20mg 组与安慰剂组相比,主要终点(美国风湿病学会 dcSSc 联合缓解指标(CRISS)在第 52 周的评估)未达到,CRISS 评分分别为 0.888 和 0.887(P=0.4972,采用混合模型重复测量(MMRM))。第 52 周时 lenabasum 20mg 组与安慰剂组相比,改良 Rodnan 皮肤厚度评分(MRSS)的变化分别为-6.7 和-8.1(P=0.1183,采用 MMRM)。预先设定的分析显示,在接受背景霉酚酸酯治疗的患者和接受 IST 治疗时间≤1 年的患者中,CRISS 评分更高,MRSS 改善更大,用力肺活量下降更少。未观察到与 lenabasum 相关的死亡或严重不良事件增加。
本研究未证实 lenabasum 对 dcSSc 的疗效。大多数患者接受 IST 背景治疗,特别是霉酚酸酯治疗与更好的结局相关。这些发现支持 IST 治疗 dcSSc,强调了当研究性治疗被添加到标准 IST 治疗中时,证明治疗效果具有挑战性。这些发现对 SSc 试验设计以及临床护理具有相关性。